CHINESE JOURNAL OF OIL CROP SCIENCES ›› 2022, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (2): 307-315.doi: 10.19802/j.issn.1007-9084.2021048
Previous Articles Next Articles
Hong-chang JIA(), De-zhi HAN(
), Hong-rui YAN, Lei ZHANG, Ji-li LIANG, Xiao-fei YAN, Hai-fang ZHU, Wen-cheng LU(
)
Received:
2020-11-28
Online:
2022-04-25
Published:
2022-05-06
Contact:
Wen-cheng LU
E-mail:13845677276@163.com;handezhi2008@163.com;13845674288@163.com
CLC Number:
Hong-chang JIA, De-zhi HAN, Hong-rui YAN, Lei ZHANG, Ji-li LIANG, Xiao-fei YAN, Hai-fang ZHU, Wen-cheng LU. Comparative study on identification methods of soybean maturity group[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF OIL CROP SCIENCES, 2022, 44(2): 307-315.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: http://www.jouroilcrops.cn/EN/10.19802/j.issn.1007-9084.2021048
Table 1
Days to maturity of North American soybean MG standard varieties in Heihe, China
品种 Variety | 生育期组 MG | 标准品种的生育期日数(天) Days to maturity of MG standard varieties /d | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
2018 | 2019 | 2020 | ||
Maple Presto(E) | MG 000 | 107.1±1.00 | 88.5±0.16 | 81.9±0.25 |
OAC Vision(L) | MG 000 | 108.0±0.58 | 93.8±0.08 | 87.8±0.18 |
Canatto(E) | MG 00 | 104.7±0.88 | 97.8±0.16 | 92.0±0.41 |
Maple Ridge(E) | MG 00 | 95.8±0.06 | 96.3±0.34 | |
Glacier(L) | MG 00 | 121.3±0.86 | 107.3±0.20 | 95.2±0.15 |
MN0201(E) | MG 0 | 124.3±0.66 | 120.4±0.18 | 99.4±0.12 |
Traill(E) | MG 0 | 125.7±0.80 | 113.1±0.23 | 99.1±0.13 |
MN0901(L) | MG 0 | 133.0±0.55 | 124.9±0.21 | 115.4±0.11 |
Surge(L) | MG 0 | 未成熟(not matured) | 未成熟(not matured) | 未成熟(not matured) |
Harlon(E) | MGⅠ | 未成熟(not matured) | 未成熟(not matured) | 未成熟(not matured) |
Haroson(E) | MGⅠ | 未成熟(not matured) | 未成熟(not matured) | 未成熟(not matured) |
NE1900(L) | MGⅠ | 未成熟(not matured) | 未成熟(not matured) | 未成熟(not matured) |
Titan(L) | MGⅠ | 未成熟(not matured) | 未成熟(not matured) | 未成熟(not matured) |
Table 2
Days from emergence to maturity of earlier varieties than MG000 group standard varieties
品种 Variety | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 平均 Average | 品种 Variety | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 平均 Average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
R4 | 89 | 78.3 | 72.1 | 79.8 | 呼交07-2123 Hujiao 07-2123 | 101 | 79.1 | 73.9 | 84.7 |
Paula | 92 | 79.8 | 77.8 | 83.1 | 呼交07-2479 Hujiao 07-2479 | 95 | 78.9 | 76.3 | 83.4 |
star4/75 | 84 | 78.2 | 73.3 | 78.4 | 岭北8号 Lingbei 8 | 94 | 82.5 | 79.0 | 85.2 |
东农36 Dongnong 36 | 85.5 | 77.3 | 81.4 | R3 | 94 | 80.0 | 76.6 | 83.5 | |
东农41 Dongnong 41 | 94 | 84.3 | 77.9 | 85.3 | 东农41-C Dongnong 41-C | 96 | 84.0 | 81.8 | 87.3 |
登科2号 Dengke 2 | 87.6 | 82.7 | 85.2 | Sunset | 85 | 77.9 | 74.2 | 79.0 |
Fig. 1
Cluster analysis of the varieties from northeast high latitudes region in China and far-east RussiaNote: Taking the whole growth period of soybean varieties in the northern part of Northeast China and Amur Region of Russia in 3 years as the index, the Euclidian distance between varieties is calculated and the systematic cluster analysis is conducted. The clustering method is the sum of squares of deviation and the tree diagram is established. When the threshold value is 232.1, the above varieties could be divided into 4 groups
Table 3
Criteria for classification of MG classification of soybean varieties in northern cold area of China and fareast Russia
生育 期组 MG | 生育期日数 Days to maturity | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2018 | 2019 | 2020 | |||||||
最短 Min | 最长 Max | 分组标准 Criteria for classification | 最短 Min | 最长 Max | 分组标准 Criteria for classification | 最短 Min | 最长 Max | 分组标准 Criteria for classification | |
MG 0000 | 84 | 101 | 84-95 | 78 | 88 | 78-90 | 72 | 82 | 72-82 |
MG 000 | 102 | 113 | 96-110 | 89 | 99 | 91-102 | 83 | 90 | 83-94 |
MG 00 | 114 | 120 | 111-123 | 100 | 111 | 103-114 | 91 | 102 | 95-105 |
MG 0 | 121 | 137 | 124-137 | 112 | 131 | 115-130 | 103 | 116 | 106-116 |
Table 4
Growth period and group value of introduced varieties in North America
品种 Variety | 2018 | 2019 | 生育期平均值 Mean growth period | 生育期组值 Maturity group value | 转换后的生育期组值 Standardized maturity group value |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Maple presto | 88.5 | 81.9 | 85.2 | 000.9 | 1.9 |
Alta | 102.4 | 97.8 | 100.1 | 00.3 | 2.3 |
Maple Ridge | 95.8 | 96.3 | 96.1 | 00.3 | 2.3 |
Rolard | 107.5 | 96.6 | 102.3 | 00.8 | 2.8 |
Glengarry | 112.7 | 105.5 | 109.1 | 0.1 | 3.1 |
Traill | 113.1 | 99.1 | 106.1 | 0.0 | 3.0 |
Table 5
Criteria for classification of MG classification of soybean varieties in northern cold area of China and far-east Russia
生育期组 MG | 2018 | 2019 | 平均 Mean | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
分组标准 Criteria for classification | 变幅 Range | 分组标准 Criteria for classification | 变幅 Range | 分组标准 Criteria for classification | 变幅 Range | |
MG0000 | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
MG000 | 77-90 | 13 | 68-83 | 15 | 76-88 | 12 |
MG00 | 91-112 | 21 | 84-103 | 19 | 89-107 | 18 |
MG0 | 113-129 | 16 | 104-116 | 12 | 108-125 | 17 |
Table 6
Criteria for MG classification of soybean varieties in northern cold area of China
生育期组 MG | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
分组标准 Criteria for classification | 变幅 Range | 分组标准 Criteria for classification | 变幅 Range | 分组标准 Criteria for classification | 变幅 Range | |
MG0000 | 84-95 | 11 | 78-87 | 9 | 72-80 | 8 |
MG000 | 96-105 | 9 | 88-98 | 10 | 81-90 | 9 |
MG00 | 106-116 | 10 | 99-112 | 13 | 91-105 | 14 |
MG0 | 117-126 | 9 | 113-130 | 17 | 106-115 | 9 |
Table 7
Comparison table of grouping results of three grouping methods
生育 期组 MG | 聚类分析法 Clustering methodology | 区间法 Interval method | 回归分析法 Regression analysis method | 综合判断 Synthetic judgment | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
分组范围 Criteria for classification | 变幅 Range | 分组范围 Criteria for classification | 变幅 Range | 分组范围 Criteria for classification | 变幅 Range | 分组范围 Criteria for classification | 变幅 Range | |
MG0000 | 76-90 | 14 | 76-90 | 14 | -- | -- | 76-88 | 12 |
MG000 | 91-101 | 10 | 91-98 | 7 | 76-87 | 11 | 89-100 | 11 |
MG00 | 102-112 | 10 | 99-112 | 13 | 88-107 | 19 | 101-112 | 11 |
MG0 | 113-125 | 12 | 113-125 | 12 | 108-125 | 17 | 113-125 | 12 |
Table 8
The name and MGs of the tested variety
生育期组MG | 品种Variety |
---|---|
MG0000 | 东农41-C,登科2,东农41,岭北8号,呼交 07-2123,东农 36,R-3*,呼交 07-2479,Paula*,R-4*,Sunset*,Star 4/75* |
MG000 | Sunset 1*黑河11,黑河12,蒙豆7号,黑河20,哈 6223-4,黑河44,黑河 41,黑河 35&, 黑河28,垦农8号,R-2*,Bista*,黑河 14,Sonata*,黑河 49 |
MG00 | Lydia*,东农40,合丰37,丰收23,黑河 13,北豆 24,Terek*,蒙豆 31, Dewdrop*,华疆2号&,北丰1,黑河33&,北02-7495,黑河8,黑河37,北豆16,黑河9,Amur 283*,蒙豆 11,黑河3,Gritiaz 80*,Amur 262*,十月革命70*,蒙豆9,harmony*,黑河 51,R-1,黑河 45&,黑河39,黑河7,黑河7,九丰10,黑河5,黑河50,Lydia*, |
MG0 | 黑河18,丰收15,北1249,黑河 36,丰收26,九丰9,丰收27,北豆37,华疆3号,中作GHJ90962, 黑河 38,蒙豆30, 黑河48,北豆8号, 黑河46,丰收24,疆莫豆1号, 东农47D,东农434,嫩丰11,东农163,北豆21, 黑河43&,北豆19 |
1 |
盖钧镒, 汪越胜. 中国大豆品种生态区域划分的研究[J].中国农业科学,2001, 34(2):139-145. DOI:10.3321/j.issn: 0578-1752.2001.02.005 .
doi: 10.3321/j.issn: 0578-1752.2001.02.005 |
2 |
盖钧镒, 汪越胜, 张孟臣,等.中国大豆品种熟期组划分的研究[J]. 作物学报, 2001, 27(3): 286-292. DOI:10.3321/j.issn: 0496-3490.2001.03.003 .
doi: 10.3321/j.issn: 0496-3490.2001.03.003 |
3 |
汪越胜,马宏惠.美国的大豆熟期划分及其影响[J].安徽农学通报,2000(04):28-29. DOI:CNKI:SUN:AHNB.0.2000-04-010 .
doi: CNKI:SUN:AHNB.0.2000-04-010 |
4 |
Hartwig E E, Kiihl R A S. Identification and utilization of a delayed flowering character in soybean for short-day conditions[J]. Field Crops Research, 1979, 2(2):145-151. DOI:10.1016/0378-4290(79)90017-0 .
doi: 10.1016/0378-4290(79)90017-0 |
5 |
Singh, Ajit, Carsky, et al. Soybean Maturity and Environment Effects in Savanna Systems: I. Dry Matter Accumulation.[J]. Journal of Sustainable Agriculture, 2002.20(1):75–93. DOI:10.1300/J064v20n01_08 .
doi: 10.1300/J064v20n01_08 |
6 |
汪越胜, 盖钧镒. 中国大豆栽培区划的修正 I.修正方案与修正理由[J]. 大豆科学, 2000, 19(3): 203-209. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-9841.2000.03.002 .
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-9841.2000.03.002 |
7 |
Zhang L X, Kyei‐Boahen S., Zhang J, et al. Modifications of optimum adaptation zones for soybean maturity groups in the USA[J]. Crop Management, 2007, 6(1). DOI:10.1094/CM-2007-0927-01-RS .
doi: 10.1094/CM-2007-0927-01-RS |
8 |
吴存祥, 李继存, 沙爱华, 等. 国家大豆品种区域试验对照品种的生育期组归属[J]. 作物学报, 2012, 38(11): 1977-1987. DOI:10.3724/SP.J.1006.2012.01977 .
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2012.01977 |
9 |
Alliprandini, Fernando Luís, Abatti C, et al. Understanding soybean maturity groups in brazil: environment, cultivar classification, and stability[J]. Crop Science, 2009, 49(3):801. DOI: 10.4236/ajps.2013.411258 .
doi: 10.4236/ajps.2013.411258 |
10 |
李灿东, 郭泰, 王志新, 等. 黑龙江省主要大豆品种生育期组归属研究[J]. 中国油料作物学报, 2015, 37(2): 154-159. DOI:10.7505/j.issn.1007-9084.2015.02.005 .
doi: 10.7505/j.issn.1007-9084.2015.02.005 |
11 |
邱楚婵, 年海, 赵祯丽, 等. 华南三省区大豆生育期组划分的评价与研究[J]. 大豆科学, 2015, 34(4): 555-564. DOI:10.11861/j.issn.1000-9841.2015.04.0555 .
doi: 10.11861/j.issn.1000-9841.2015.04.0555 |
12 |
王路路, 林艺, 姜磊, 等. 安徽淮北地区主栽大豆品种生育期组划分的研究初报[J]. 作物杂志, 2015(2): 36-38. DOI:10.16035/j.issn.1001-7283.2015.02.008 .
doi: 10.16035/j.issn.1001-7283.2015.02.008 |
13 |
胡铁欢, 曹金峰, 卢思慧, 等. 河北省大豆生育期划分初探[J]. 北京农业, 2015(12): 62-63. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-6966.2015.12.053 .
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6966.2015.12.053 |
14 |
赵银月, 魏生广, 詹和明, 等. 云南大豆品种生育期组归属的研究[J]. 大豆科学, 2015, 34(6): 1000-1005. DOI:10.11861/j.issn.1000-9841.2015.06.1000 .
doi: 10.11861/j.issn.1000-9841.2015.06.1000 |
15 |
傅蒙蒙,王燕平,任海祥,等.东北春大豆熟期组的划分与地理分布[J].大豆科学,2016,35(2):181-192. DOI:10.11861/j.issn.1000-9841.2016.02.0181 .
doi: 10.11861/j.issn.1000-9841.2016.02.0181 |
16 |
郑宇宏, 陈亮, 范旭红, 等. 吉育系列大豆品种生育期组的划分研究[J]. 大豆科学, 2016, 35(2): 201-208. DOI:10.11861/j.issn.1000-9841.2016.02.0201 .
doi: 10.11861/j.issn.1000-9841.2016.02.0201 |
17 |
胡兴国, 宋雯雯, 魏云山, 等. 内蒙古自治区大豆品种生育期分组及种植区划[J]. 中国农业科学, 2016, 49(2): 260-271. DOI:10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2016.02.007 .
doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2016.02.007 |
18 |
张晓荣, 魏云山, 曹磊, 等. 赤峰地区大豆品种(系)生育期组划分[J]. 大豆科学, 2015, 34(4): 571-575. DOI:10.11861/j.issn.1000-9841.2015.04.0571 .
doi: 10.11861/j.issn.1000-9841.2015.04.0571 |
19 |
Jia H, Jiang B, Wu C, et al. Maturity group classification and maturity locus genotyping of early-maturing soybean varieties from high-latitude cold regions[J]. PLoS One, 2014, 9(4): e94139. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0094139 .
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0094139 |
20 |
Song W W, Sun S, Ibrahim S E. Standard cultivar selection and digital quantification for precise classification of maturity groups in soybean[J]. Crop Science, 2019, 59(5). DOI:10.2135/cropsci2019.02.0095 .
doi: 10.2135/cropsci2019.02.0095 |
21 | Fehr W R, Caviness C E. Stages of Soybean Development. Special Report 80[R], Cooperative Extension Service, Agriculture and Home Economic Experiment Station. Ames, Iowa: Iowa State University, 1977: 1-11. |
22 | 唐启义. DPS数据处理系统: 基础统计及实验设计 (全三册) 第4版[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2016. |
23 | 常汝镇,李福山,马德泉.大豆引种规律的研究——Ⅱ 美国大豆品种在我国试种的表现[J].中国油料,1981(1):35-44. |
[1] | Lu-lu LIU, Jian-fei LI, Yue SHU, xiao-yang CHEN, Gui-xiang TANG. Current situation of soybean production and consumption in China and strategies to improve self-sufficiency rate [J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF OIL CROP SCIENCES, 2022, 44(2): 242-248. |
[2] | Lu HAN, Ke-xin QU, Yong-fu FU, Qing-shan CHEN, Xiao-xia WU, Xiao-mei ZHANG. A study on the function of GmWUS2 gene regulating the number of soybean nodules [J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF OIL CROP SCIENCES, 2022, 44(2): 289-297. |
[3] | Le GAO, Zhi-qiang LI, Kai LI, Hai-jian ZHI. Advances in transgenic resistance to soybean mosaic virus disease [J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF OIL CROP SCIENCES, 2022, 44(2): 434-441. |
[4] | Ying-lu HU, Xin-yue TIAN, Lei CHEN, Ning DING, Xiao-feng LI, Yu GAO, Shu-sen SHI. Analysis of fertility and population trend of experimental population of Riptortus pedestris fed on soybean pods [J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF OIL CROP SCIENCES, 2022, 44(2): 460-466. |
[5] | Yue LI, Hai-yan LI, Yuan-yuan ZHOU, Jing-sheng CHEN, Ji-dong YU. Effect of ethanol extract of industrial hemp stalks on physiological and biochemical metabolism of soybean cyst nematode [J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF OIL CROP SCIENCES, 2022, 44(1): 177-182. |
[6] | Jia-lin LIU, Hui-min XIE, Zheng ZHANG, Bo-yun YANG, Huo-lin LUO, Gui-ru GONG, Dong-jin XIONG. Population structure and genetic analysis within soybean cultivars of Huang-Huai-Hai and Southern region of China based on SSR markers related to QTL [J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF OIL CROP SCIENCES, 2022, 44(1): 63-71. |
[7] | Yang ZHOU, Xiao-feng YUE, Xiao-qian TANG, Hong-lin YAN, Qi ZHANG, Pei-wu LI. A preliminary study on the coupling effect of aflatoxin green control and super-nodulation [J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF OIL CROP SCIENCES, 2021, 43(6): 947-960. |
[8] | Wei-ming ZENG, Yan-zhu SU, Zhen-guang LAI, Shou-zhen YANG, Huai-zhu CHEN, Yu-rong TAN, Zu-dong SUN, Jun-yi GAI. Identification of candidate gene controlling shade-tolerant by BSA-Seq in soybean [J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF OIL CROP SCIENCES, 2021, 43(6): 1006-1015. |
[9] | Yi-qiang HAN, Ya-mei GAO, Yan-li DU, Yu-xian ZHANG, Ji-dao DU, Wen-hui ZHANG, Shao-yu PAN. Identification of saline-alkali tolerant germplasm resources of soybean during the whole growth stage [J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF OIL CROP SCIENCES, 2021, 43(6): 1016-1024. |
[10] | Jian-qiu LIANG, Xiao-bo YU, Ze-min HE, Jian-gang AN, Jia WANG, Zhao-qiong ZENG, Wen-ying YANG, Hai-ying WU, Ming-rong ZHANG. Comparative study on the agronomic traits and yield of soybean varieties with different maturity in maize-soybean intercropping system [J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF OIL CROP SCIENCES, 2021, 43(6): 1077-1086. |
[11] | Ji-liang WANG, Chun-mei ZONG, De-liang WANG, Yan-ping WANG, Hong-xin JIANG, Dan-xia YANG, Meng-meng FU, Lei WANG, Hai-xiang REN, Tuan-jie ZHAO, Wei-guang DU, Jun-yi GAI. Identification, evaluation and improvement utilization of northeast China Soybean Germplasm Population in Jiamusi [J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF OIL CROP SCIENCES, 2021, 43(6): 996-1005. |
[12] | YANG Yong-qing, CHEN Sheng-nan, LI Xin-xin, ZHAO Qing-song, FU Ya-shu, YANG Chun-Yan, ZHANG Meng-chen, LIAO Hong. Genetic analysis and QTL mapping of soybean leaf shape under rhizobia inoculated environment [J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF OIL CROP SCIENCES, 2021, 43(5): 825-. |
[13] | XU Ying, YU Zhen-hua, LI Yan-sheng, JIN Jian, WANG Guang-hua, LIU Xiao-bing. Impact of elevated atmospheric CO2 concentration on carbohydrate accumulation in different organs of soybean plant [J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF OIL CROP SCIENCES, 2021, 43(5): 859-. |
[14] | WANG Hua-mei, REN Chun-yuan, JIN Xi-jun, WANG Xue-meng, CAO Liang, ZHANG Ming-cong, ZHAO Qiang, YU Gao-bo, ZHANG Yu-xian . Effects of exogenous melatonin on nitrogen metabolism and growth of soybean under high nitrogen [J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF OIL CROP SCIENCES, 2021, 43(5): 872-. |
[15] | CHANG Xing-chao, WANG Xue-song, ZHANG Yan-zheng, JING Ya, CHEN Long, ZHAO Jia-liang, FANG Qing-wei, SONG Chun-xiao, LI Yong-guang, LI Wen-bin. Cloning and salt resistance analysis of soybean GmPUB32 gene [J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF OIL CROP SCIENCES, 2021, 43(4): 638-. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||