CHINESE JOURNAL OF OIL CROP SCIENCES ›› 2021, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (6): 1031-1041.doi: 10.19802/j.issn.1007-9084.2021145
Previous Articles Next Articles
Jian-wei LYU1(), Min JIANG1, Yong-guo TIAN2, Ting-hui HU1, Liang-qiang CHENG1, Qing-lin RAO1, Jin-hua WANG1, Jun WANG1(
)
Received:
2021-05-17
Online:
2021-12-22
Published:
2021-12-23
Contact:
Jun WANG
E-mail:jianweilv@163.com;962162398@qq.com
CLC Number:
Jian-wei LYU, Min JIANG, Yong-guo TIAN, Ting-hui HU, Liang-qiang CHENG, Qing-lin RAO, Jin-hua WANG, Jun WANG. Analysis on nutrients and comprehensive feeding evaluation of peanut plant[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF OIL CROP SCIENCES, 2021, 43(6): 1031-1041.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: http://www.jouroilcrops.cn/EN/10.19802/j.issn.1007-9084.2021145
Table 1
Information of forty peanut varieties and breeding lines
材料编号 Code | 品种(系)来源 Varieties of sources | 材料编号 Code | 品种(系)来源 Varieties of sources |
---|---|---|---|
G191006 | 贵州省地方品种 Guizhou Province local varieties | Y19157 | 贵州省油料研究所选育品系 Guizhou Oil Research Iinstitute Breeding Line |
G191025 | 贵州省地方品种 Guizhou Province local varieties | Y19213 | 贵州省油料研究所选育品系 Guizhou Oil Research Iinstitute Breeding Line |
G191044 | 贵州省地方品种 Guizhou Province local varieties | Y19214 | 贵州省油料研究所选育品系 Guizhou Oil Research Iinstitute Breeding Line |
G191051 | 贵州省地方品种 Guizhou Province local varieties | Y19216 | 贵州省油料研究所选育品系 Guizhou Oil Research Iinstitute Breeding Line |
G191053 | 贵州省地方品种 Guizhou Province local varieties | Y19217 | 贵州省油料研究所选育品系 Guizhou Oil Research Iinstitute Breeding Line |
G191055 | 贵州省地方品种 Guizhou Province local varieties | Y19229 | 贵州省油料研究所选育品系 Guizhou Oil Research Iinstitute Breeding Line |
G191056 | 贵州省地方品种 Guizhou Province local varieties | Y19230 | 贵州省油料研究所选育品系 Guizhou Oil Research Iinstitute Breeding Line |
G191060 | 贵州省地方品种 Guizhou Province local varieties | Y19234 | 贵州省油料研究所选育品系 Guizhou Oil Research Iinstitute Breeding Line |
G191066 | 贵州省地方品种 Guizhou Province local varieties | Y19243 | 贵州省油料研究所选育品系 Guizhou Oil Research Iinstitute Breeding Line |
G19291 | 贵州省地方品种 Guizhou Province local varieties | Y19253 | 贵州省油料研究所选育品系 Guizhou Oil Research Iinstitute Breeding Line |
GUIHUA169QINGGAN | 贵州省油料研究所选育品系 Guizhou Oil Research Iinstitute Breeding Line | Y19255 | 贵州省油料研究所选育品系 Guizhou Oil Research Iinstitute Breeding Line |
GUIHUA169ZIGAN | 贵州省油料研究所选育品系 Guizhou Oil Research Iinstitute Breeding Line | Y19257 | 贵州省油料研究所选育品系 Guizhou Oil Research Iinstitute Breeding Line |
J083 | 贵州省油料研究所选育品系 Guizhou Oil Research Iinstitute Breeding Line | Y19260 | 贵州省油料研究所选育品系 Guizhou Oil Research Iinstitute Breeding Line |
J083HEI | 贵州省油料研究所选育品系 Guizhou Oil Research Iinstitute Breeding Line | Y19263 | 贵州省油料研究所选育品系 Guizhou Oil Research Iinstitute Breeding Line |
NF217 | 贵州省油料研究所选育品系 Guizhou Oil Research Iinstitute Breeding Line | Y19265 | 贵州省油料研究所选育品系 Guizhou Oil Research Iinstitute Breeding Line |
NF220 | 贵州省油料研究所选育品系 Guizhou Oil Research Iinstitute Breeding Line | Y19267 | 贵州省油料研究所选育品系 Guizhou Oil Research Iinstitute Breeding Line |
NI002FUBEN | 贵州省油料研究所选育品系 Guizhou Oil Research Iinstitute Breeding Line | Y19307 | 贵州省油料研究所选育品系 Guizhou Oil Research Iinstitute Breeding Line |
NI002 | 贵州省油料研究所选育品系 Guizhou Oil Research Iinstitute Breeding Line | Y19308 | 贵州省油料研究所选育品系 Guizhou Oil Research Iinstitute Breeding Line |
Y19123 | 贵州省油料研究所选育品系 Guizhou Oil Research Iinstitute Breeding Line | Y19309 | 贵州省油料研究所选育品系 Guizhou Oil Research Iinstitute Breeding Line |
Y19154 | 贵州省油料研究所选育品系 Guizhou Oil Research Iinstitute Breeding Line | ZIHUA | 云南省地方品种 Yunnan Province local varieties |
Table 1
Variation of quality characteristics of stalks and leaves in 40 peanut varieties and breeding lines
性状指标 Index | 变幅/% Range | 均值/% Average | 标准差 SD | 变异系数/% CV |
---|---|---|---|---|
X1 (Protein) | 4.81~12.73 | 9.11 | 2.15 | 23.56 |
X2(Ash) | 11.25~21.74 | 14.92 | 2.92 | 19.58 |
X3(Ca) | 0.75~1.05 | 0.88 | 0.08 | 8.58 |
X4(P) | 0.17~0.24 | 0.21 | 0.02 | 9.96 |
X5(NDF) | 13.15~61.27 | 39.85 | 11.02 | 27.66 |
X6(ADF) | 9.53~35.32 | 23.42 | 6.1 | 26.04 |
X7(DM) | 90.76~94.43 | 92.79 | 0.93 | 1.01 |
X8(ADL) | 0.05~8.75 | 4.27 | 2.6 | 60.88 |
X9(IVDMD) | 18.32~75.47 | 41.89 | 14.06 | 33.57 |
X10 (Protein) | 10.51~21.24 | 14.77 | 2.86 | 19.4 |
X11(Ash) | 9.48~27.13 | 14.5 | 4.2 | 28.95 |
X12(Ca) | 0.65~1.23 | 0.92 | 0.16 | 17.71 |
X13(P) | 0.11~0.24 | 0.18 | 0.04 | 21.62 |
X14(NDF) | 0.2~33.31 | 17.44 | 9.85 | 56.44 |
X15(ADF) | 1.83~24.03 | 13.72 | 6.36 | 46.33 |
X16(DM) | 89.75~94.91 | 92.1 | 1.26 | 1.36 |
X17(ADL) | 0.22~8.55 | 3.48 | 2.17 | 62.51 |
X18(IVDMD) | 9.7~81.89 | 40.32 | 21.7 | 53.82 |
Table 2
Correlative coefficient of quality traits of peanut stalks and leaves
指标Index | X1 | X2 | X3 | X4 | X5 | X6 | X7 | X8 | X9 | X10 | X11 | X12 | X13 | X14 | X15 | X16 | X17 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
X2 | 0.696** | ||||||||||||||||
X3 | -0.377* | -0.575** | |||||||||||||||
X4 | -0.737** | -0.728** | 0.848** | ||||||||||||||
X5 | -0.663** | -0.834** | 0.290 | 0.546** | |||||||||||||
X6 | -0.615** | -0.743** | 0.556** | 0.707** | 0.767** | ||||||||||||
X7 | -0.150 | 0.034 | 0.663** | 0.524** | -0.302 | 0.101 | |||||||||||
X8 | -0.294 | -0.662** | 0.162 | 0.248 | 0.851** | 0.732** | -0.484** | ||||||||||
X9 | 0.808** | 0.921** | -0.706** | -0.861** | -0.727** | -0.699** | -0.202 | -0.445** | |||||||||
X10 | 0.657** | 0.403* | -0.216 | -0.466** | -0.367* | -0.293 | -0.112 | -0.112 | 0.535** | ||||||||
X11 | 0.525** | 0.304 | -0.204 | -0.397* | -0.272 | -0.202 | -0.129 | -0.066 | 0.435** | 0.895** | |||||||
X12 | -0.502** | -0.300 | 0.282 | 0.384* | 0.294 | 0.250 | 0.207 | 0.075 | -0.452** | -0.692** | -0.733** | ||||||
X13 | -0.542** | -0.356* | 0.260 | 0.399* | 0.344* | 0.275 | 0.149 | 0.129 | -0.482** | -0.805** | -0.832** | 0.965** | |||||
X14 | -0.590** | -0.462** | 0.157 | 0.431** | 0.488** | 0.250 | -0.053 | 0.206 | -0.489** | -0.570** | -0.472** | 0.377* | 0.496** | ||||
X15 | -0.638** | -0.464** | 0.154 | 0.384* | 0.546** | 0.398* | -0.080 | 0.320* | -0.505** | -0.473** | -0.424** | 0.682** | 0.712** | 0.653** | |||
X16 | -0.161 | -0.108 | 0.244 | 0.182 | 0.117 | 0.148 | 0.231 | 0.015 | -0.219 | -0.178 | -0.156 | 0.758** | 0.597** | 0.038 | 0.447** | ||
X17 | -0.439** | -0.387* | 0.064 | 0.272 | 0.393* | 0.197 | -0.207 | 0.239 | -0.354* | -0.262 | -0.101 | 0.064 | 0.165 | 0.802** | 0.562** | -0.125 | |
X18 | 0.681** | 0.443** | -0.288 | -0.539** | -0.510** | -0.433** | -0.151 | -0.246 | 0.540** | 0.775** | 0.758** | -0.788** | -0.833** | -0.672** | -0.726** | -0.409** | -0.336* |
Table 3
Correlation of calcium, phosphorus and protein between stalks, leaves and seeds
茎秆 Stalk | 叶片 Leaf | 种子 Seed | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
钙 Ca | 磷P | 蛋白质 Protein | 钙 Ca | 磷P | 蛋白质 Protein | 钙 Ca | 磷P | 蛋白质 Protein | ||
种子 Seed | 钙 Ca | 0.403* | 0.579** | -0.614** | 0.511** | 0.540** | -0.574** | 1 | ||
磷P | 0.342* | 0.440** | -0.441** | 0.408* | 0.408* | -0.440** | 0.931** | 1 | ||
蛋白质Protein | 0.256 | 0.288 | -0.355* | 0.344* | 0.324 | -0.393* | 0.810** | 0.825** | 1 |
Table 4
First five principal components based on eighteen traits of forty peanut varieties and breeding lines
性状 Index | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
X1 | 0.595* | 0.534 | -0.194 | 0.312 | 0.055 |
X2 | 0.900* | 0.208 | -0.099 | 0.151 | 0.033 |
X3 | -0.539 | -0.092 | 0.765* | 0.058 | 0.090 |
X4 | -0.671* | -0.310 | 0.627 | -0.133 | -0.037 |
X5 | 0.899* | 0.214 | 0.250 | 0.156 | -0.041 |
X6 | 0.898* | 0.115 | -0.119 | -0.056 | -0.064 |
X7 | 0.107 | -0.124 | 0.940* | 0.108 | 0.085 |
X8 | 0.843* | -0.032 | 0.459 | -0.052 | -0.051 |
X9 | 0.796* | 0.361 | -0.335 | 0.157 | 0.000 |
X10 | 0.210 | 0.918* | -0.052 | 0.079 | 0.178 |
X11 | 0.115 | 0.954* | -0.038 | -0.061 | 0.170 |
X12 | -0.141 | -0.827* | 0.092 | 0.026 | 0.523 |
X13 | -0.171 | -0.902* | 0.035 | -0.044 | 0.352 |
X14 | 0.272 | 0.490 | 0.010 | 0.762* | 0.076 |
X15 | 0.360 | 0.514 | 0.111 | 0.515* | -0.454 |
X16 | -0.062 | -0.318 | 0.140 | 0.114 | 0.896* |
X17 | 0.264 | 0.104 | 0.085 | 0.914* | 0.078 |
X18 | 0.322 | 0.815* | -0.056 | 0.230 | -0.185 |
特征值 Special value | 8.572 | 2.931 | 2.344 | 1.495 | 1.061 |
贡献率Contribution rate /% | 47.621 | 16.283 | 13.020 | 8.305 | 5.894 |
累积贡献率 Cumulative contribution rate /% | 47.621 | 63.904 | 76.924 | 85.228 | 91.122 |
Table 5
Comprehensive feeding evaluation of peanut stalks and leaves
品种(系) Varieties(lines) | FAC1 | FAC2 | FAC3 | FAC4 | FAC5 | U1 | U2 | U3 | U4 | U5 | 综合评价D值 D value |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
G191006 | -0.872 | 0.039 | 0.020 | -1.003 | -1.387 | 0.245 | 0.355 | 0.524 | 0.410 | 0.154 | 0.314 |
G191025 | -0.636 | -0.754 | 1.486 | -0.891 | -0.753 | 0.307 | 0.147 | 0.869 | 0.436 | 0.312 | 0.371 |
G191044 | -0.436 | -0.700 | -0.340 | -0.951 | 0.450 | 0.359 | 0.161 | 0.439 | 0.422 | 0.612 | 0.357 |
G191051 | -1.455 | -1.129 | -0.734 | 0.549 | -0.125 | 0.094 | 0.049 | 0.346 | 0.773 | 0.468 | 0.208 |
G191053 | -1.820 | 2.493 | -0.200 | -2.133 | 1.253 | 0.000 | 1.000 | 0.472 | 0.145 | 0.811 | 0.312 |
G191055 | -0.678 | -0.404 | 1.893 | 1.485 | -0.541 | 0.296 | 0.239 | 0.965 | 0.992 | 0.365 | 0.449 |
G191056 | 1.587 | -0.433 | 0.676 | -0.563 | 0.320 | 0.883 | 0.231 | 0.678 | 0.513 | 0.579 | 0.684 |
G191060 | -1.173 | -0.838 | -0.888 | 0.199 | -0.244 | 0.168 | 0.125 | 0.310 | 0.691 | 0.439 | 0.246 |
G191066 | -0.817 | -0.114 | 1.621 | 1.391 | 1.953 | 0.260 | 0.315 | 0.901 | 0.970 | 0.986 | 0.473 |
G19291 | 1.906 | -0.125 | -0.088 | 0.349 | -0.089 | 0.966 | 0.312 | 0.498 | 0.726 | 0.477 | 0.729 |
GUIHUA169QINGGAN | -1.092 | 0.408 | 0.410 | 1.518 | 1.078 | 0.189 | 0.452 | 0.616 | 1.000 | 0.768 | 0.408 |
GUIHUA169ZIGAN | -0.963 | -0.827 | -0.181 | -0.495 | -0.159 | 0.222 | 0.128 | 0.476 | 0.529 | 0.460 | 0.285 |
J083 | -0.297 | -0.571 | 0.938 | -0.883 | -0.597 | 0.395 | 0.195 | 0.740 | 0.438 | 0.351 | 0.409 |
J083HEI | -0.869 | -1.027 | -0.694 | -0.379 | 0.136 | 0.246 | 0.075 | 0.356 | 0.556 | 0.533 | 0.278 |
NF217 | -0.307 | -0.944 | 1.696 | 0.121 | 1.590 | 0.392 | 0.097 | 0.919 | 0.673 | 0.895 | 0.473 |
NF220 | 0.016 | -0.915 | 0.395 | -0.724 | -0.247 | 0.476 | 0.105 | 0.612 | 0.475 | 0.438 | 0.426 |
NI002FU | -0.052 | -1.071 | 0.932 | 0.014 | 0.697 | 0.458 | 0.064 | 0.739 | 0.648 | 0.673 | 0.459 |
NI002 | 0.279 | -0.753 | 2.041 | -1.267 | -1.204 | 0.544 | 0.148 | 1.000 | 0.348 | 0.200 | 0.498 |
Y19123 | -1.127 | 1.398 | -0.332 | 0.960 | -0.918 | 0.179 | 0.712 | 0.441 | 0.869 | 0.271 | 0.381 |
Y19154 | -0.351 | -0.751 | -2.203 | -1.005 | -0.137 | 0.381 | 0.148 | 0.000 | 0.409 | 0.465 | 0.293 |
Y19157 | 0.050 | -1.314 | -1.786 | 0.477 | 1.678 | 0.485 | 0.000 | 0.098 | 0.756 | 0.917 | 0.396 |
Y19213 | -1.315 | 1.499 | -0.287 | 1.040 | -0.161 | 0.131 | 0.739 | 0.452 | 0.888 | 0.459 | 0.376 |
Y19214 | -0.295 | 0.878 | -0.741 | 1.457 | 0.318 | 0.395 | 0.576 | 0.344 | 0.986 | 0.579 | 0.486 |
Y19216 | -0.120 | 2.025 | -0.168 | -0.659 | 0.212 | 0.440 | 0.877 | 0.480 | 0.490 | 0.552 | 0.536 |
Y19217 | -0.447 | -0.912 | -2.062 | -0.688 | -0.698 | 0.356 | 0.106 | 0.033 | 0.483 | 0.326 | 0.275 |
Y19229 | 0.354 | 0.127 | -0.767 | 0.213 | -2.008 | 0.563 | 0.379 | 0.338 | 0.694 | 0.000 | 0.474 |
Y19230 | 2.039 | 0.043 | 0.352 | 0.624 | 0.493 | 1.000 | 0.357 | 0.602 | 0.791 | 0.622 | 0.785 |
Y19234 | 1.447 | 0.657 | -0.481 | 0.824 | -0.710 | 0.847 | 0.518 | 0.406 | 0.837 | 0.323 | 0.690 |
Y19243 | 0.361 | 0.247 | -0.455 | 0.955 | -0.366 | 0.565 | 0.410 | 0.412 | 0.868 | 0.409 | 0.533 |
Y19253 | 0.776 | -0.928 | -1.161 | -0.137 | 1.241 | 0.673 | 0.101 | 0.246 | 0.612 | 0.808 | 0.513 |
Y19255 | 0.016 | -0.119 | -0.177 | 0.000 | -0.232 | 0.476 | 0.314 | 0.477 | 0.644 | 0.442 | 0.460 |
Y19257 | 0.095 | 1.104 | -0.248 | 1.284 | -0.318 | 0.496 | 0.635 | 0.461 | 0.945 | 0.421 | 0.552 |
Y19260 | 1.087 | 2.079 | 0.363 | -2.752 | 2.011 | 0.753 | 0.891 | 0.605 | 0.000 | 1.000 | 0.704 |
Y19263 | 1.714 | -0.643 | -0.778 | 0.746 | 0.857 | 0.916 | 0.176 | 0.336 | 0.819 | 0.713 | 0.679 |
Y19265 | 0.998 | 1.161 | -0.053 | 0.246 | -1.067 | 0.730 | 0.650 | 0.507 | 0.702 | 0.234 | 0.649 |
Y19267 | 0.925 | 1.256 | -0.704 | 0.264 | -0.256 | 0.711 | 0.675 | 0.353 | 0.706 | 0.436 | 0.635 |
Y19307 | 0.530 | 0.820 | 0.963 | 1.305 | -0.327 | 0.609 | 0.561 | 0.746 | 0.950 | 0.418 | 0.639 |
Y19308 | 1.589 | -0.349 | 0.399 | -1.096 | -1.731 | 0.883 | 0.254 | 0.613 | 0.388 | 0.069 | 0.634 |
Y19309 | 0.347 | -0.664 | 0.418 | -0.182 | 1.464 | 0.562 | 0.171 | 0.618 | 0.602 | 0.864 | 0.523 |
ZIHUA | -0.992 | 0.053 | 0.924 | -0.216 | -1.478 | 0.214 | 0.359 | 0.737 | 0.594 | 0.132 | 0.344 |
极大值 Max | 2.039 | 2.493 | 2.041 | 1.518 | 2.011 | ||||||
极小值Min | -1.820 | -1.314 | -2.203 | -2.752 | -2.008 | ||||||
极差Max-min | 3.858 | 3.807 | 4.244 | 4.271 | 4.019 | ||||||
权重 Index weight | 0.523 | 0.179 | 0.143 | 0.091 | 0.065 |
Table 6
Analysis of evaluation accuracy of equation
品种(系) Varieties(lines) | 综合评价D值 D value | 回归值 Regression | 拟合误差 Fitting error | 估计精度/% Evaluation accuracy |
---|---|---|---|---|
G191006 | 0.3140 | 0.3342 | 0.0202 | 93.5633 |
G191025 | 0.3708 | 0.3751 | 0.0043 | 98.8394 |
G191044 | 0.3570 | 0.3941 | 0.0371 | 89.5956 |
G191051 | 0.2083 | 0.2331 | 0.0248 | 88.0963 |
G191053 | 0.3118 | 0.3215 | 0.0097 | 96.8912 |
G191055 | 0.4492 | 0.4690 | 0.0198 | 95.5920 |
G191056 | 0.6839 | 0.7144 | 0.0305 | 95.5428 |
G191060 | 0.2456 | 0.2585 | 0.0129 | 94.7549 |
G191066 | 0.4731 | 0.5076 | 0.0346 | 92.6915 |
G19291 | 0.7287 | 0.7457 | 0.0170 | 97.6733 |
GUIHUA169QINGGAN | 0.4082 | 0.4315 | 0.0232 | 94.3090 |
GUIHUA169ZIGAN | 0.2849 | 0.3150 | 0.0301 | 89.4453 |
J083 | 0.4095 | 0.4073 | -0.0022 | 99.4609 |
J083HEI | 0.2782 | 0.2793 | 0.0011 | 99.5943 |
NF217 | 0.4728 | 0.4723 | -0.0005 | 99.9039 |
NF220 | 0.4264 | 0.4354 | 0.0089 | 97.9031 |
NI002FU | 0.4590 | 0.4686 | 0.0096 | 97.9105 |
NI002 | 0.4982 | 0.5080 | 0.0099 | 98.0223 |
Y19123 | 0.3808 | 0.3948 | 0.0140 | 96.3286 |
Y19154 | 0.2928 | 0.2894 | -0.0034 | 98.8338 |
Y19157 | 0.3955 | 0.4135 | 0.0180 | 95.4518 |
Y19213 | 0.3756 | 0.3819 | 0.0063 | 98.3136 |
Y19214 | 0.4859 | 0.4854 | -0.0005 | 99.9065 |
Y19216 | 0.5358 | 0.5647 | 0.0288 | 94.6225 |
Y19217 | 0.2747 | 0.2799 | 0.0052 | 98.1101 |
Y19229 | 0.4738 | 0.4869 | 0.0131 | 97.2351 |
Y19230 | 0.7847 | 0.7879 | 0.0033 | 99.5821 |
Y19234 | 0.6901 | 0.6973 | 0.0072 | 98.9589 |
Y19243 | 0.5330 | 0.5381 | 0.0050 | 99.0576 |
Y19253 | 0.5128 | 0.5294 | 0.0166 | 96.7587 |
Y19255 | 0.4603 | 0.4766 | 0.0163 | 96.4502 |
Y19257 | 0.5520 | 0.5664 | 0.0144 | 97.3835 |
Y19260 | 0.7040 | 0.7101 | 0.0060 | 99.1410 |
Y19263 | 0.6788 | 0.6880 | 0.0092 | 98.6478 |
Y19265 | 0.6493 | 0.6759 | 0.0266 | 95.9074 |
Y19267 | 0.6355 | 0.6578 | 0.0223 | 96.4954 |
Y19307 | 0.6386 | 0.6324 | -0.0062 | 99.0291 |
Y19308 | 0.6343 | 0.6636 | 0.0292 | 95.3943 |
Y19309 | 0.5230 | 0.5519 | 0.0288 | 94.4849 |
ZIHUA | 0.3442 | 0.3773 | 0.0331 | 90.3695 |
1 | 中华人民共和国农业农村部. 中国花生生产统计数据[EB/OL]. 2018. . |
2 | 刘刚, 沈镭. 中国生物质能源的定量评价及其地理分布[J]. 自然资源学报, 2007, 22: 9-19. |
3 |
张忠信, 王庆东, 赵婧伊, 等. 不同花生品种秸秆与籽仁营养成分综合分析[J]. 植物遗传资源学报, 2020, 21(1): 215-223. DOI:10.13430/j.cnki.jpgr.20191029004.
doi: 10.13430/j.cnki.jpgr.20191029004 |
4 |
张峰, 李保普, 王昆, 等. 花生秧的营养特点及其在畜牧生产中的应用[J]. 中国饲料, 2006(11): 38-39. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1004-3314.2006.11.014.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-3314.2006.11.014 |
5 |
王庆东, 赵婧伊, 赵林萍, 等. 14个花生品种秸秆的营养品质分析[J]. 中国饲料, 2019(7): 75-78. DOI:10.15906/j.cnki.cn11-2975/s.20190714.
doi: 10.15906/j.cnki.cn11-2975/s.20190714 |
6 |
Abdou N, Nsahlai I V, Chimonyo M. Effects of groundnut haulms supplementation on millet stover intake, digestibility and growth performance of lambs[J]. Animal Feed Sci Technol, 2011, 169(3/4): 176-184. DOI:10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2011.07.002.
doi: 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2011.07.002 |
7 |
陈鑫珠, 林雅婷, 黄秀声, 等. 花生秸秆在福清山羊中的瘤胃降解特性[J]. 福建农业学报, 2019, 34(11): 1270-1275. DOI:10.19303/j.issn.1008-0384.2019.11.005.
doi: 10.19303/j.issn.1008-0384.2019.11.005 |
8 |
揭雨成, 康万利, 邢虎成, 等. 苎麻饲用资源筛选[J]. 草业科学, 2009, 26(9): 30-33. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1001-0629.2009.09.006.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-0629.2009.09.006 |
9 |
Adams J F, Hartzog D L, Nelson D B. Supplemental calcium application on yield, grade, and seed quality of runner peanut[J]. Agron J, 1993, 85(1): 86-93. DOI:10.2134/agronj1993.00021962008500010018x.
doi: 10.2134/agronj1993.00021962008500010018x |
10 |
李岳, 王月福, 王铭伦, 等. 施钙对花生衰老特性和产量的影响[J]. 青岛农业大学学报: 自然科学版, 2012, 29(2): 89-93. DOI:10.3969/J.ISSN.1674-148X.2012.02.003.
doi: 10.3969/J.ISSN.1674-148X.2012.02.003 |
11 |
王才斌, 吴正锋, 赵品绩, 等. 调环酸钙对花生某些生理特性和产量的影响[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2008, 14(6): 1160-1164. DOI:10.3321/j.issn: 1008-505X.2008.06.021.
doi: 10.3321/j.issn: 1008-505X.2008.06.021 |
12 |
郑亚萍, 信彩云, 王才斌, 等. 磷肥对花生根系形态、生理特性及产量的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2013, 37(8): 777-785. DOI:10.3724/SP.J.1258.2013.00081.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1258.2013.00081 |
13 |
于天一, 王春晓, 张思斌, 等. 土壤酸胁迫下不同花生品种(系)钙吸收、分配及钙效率差异[J]. 核农学报, 2018, 32(4): 751-759. DOI:10.11869/j.issn.100-8551.2018.04.0751.
doi: 10.11869/j.issn.100-8551.2018.04.0751 |
14 |
赵秀芬, 房增国. 低钙胁迫对不同品种花生钙素吸收分配特性的影响[J]. 华北农学报, 2017, 32(2): 194-199. DOI:10.7668/hbnxb.2017.02.029.
doi: 10.7668/hbnxb.2017.02.029 |
15 |
王月福, 徐亮, 赵长星, 等. 施磷对花生积累氮素来源和产量的影响[J]. 土壤通报, 2012, 43(2): 444-450. DOI:10.19336/j.cnki.trtb.2012.02.035.
doi: 10.19336/j.cnki.trtb.2012.02.035 |
16 |
王建国, 张昊, 李林, 等. 施钙与覆膜栽培对缺钙红壤花生干物质生产、熟相、产量构成及品质的影响[J]. 华北农学报, 2018, 33(4): 131-138. DOI:10.7668/hbnxb.2018.04.019.
doi: 10.7668/hbnxb.2018.04.019 |
17 |
张佳蕾, 郭峰, 孟静静, 等. 酸性土施用钙肥对花生产量和品质及相关代谢酶活性的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2015(11): 1101-1109. DOI:10.17521/cjpe.2015.0107.
doi: 10.17521/cjpe.2015.0107 |
18 |
李文杨, 陈鑫珠, 刘远, 等. 福建省可用饲草料资源营养价值研究[J]. 中国草食动物科学, 2017, 37(6): 24-27. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.2095-3887.2017.06.007.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-3887.2017.06.007 |
19 |
唐兆秀, 董晓宁, 施恭月, 等. 福建省花生秸秆存量、品质与固碳评价[J]. 中国农学通报, 2012, 28(11): 278-283. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-6850.2012.11.055.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6850.2012.11.055 |
20 |
胡廷会, 成良强, 王军, 等. 不同基因型花生耐荫性评价及其鉴定指标的筛选[J]. 中国农业科学, 2020, 53(6): 1140-1153. DOI:10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2020.06.006.
doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2020.06.006 |
21 |
牟书靓, 李玉发, 牛海龙, 等. 基于主成分分析的花生种质资源苗期抗旱性鉴定与筛选[J]. 吉林农业科学, 2015, 40(6): 26-30, 69. DOI:10.16423/j.cnki.1003-8701.2015.06.007.
doi: 10.16423/j.cnki.1003-8701.2015.06.007 |
22 |
陈四龙, 李玉荣, 程增书, 等. 花生品种(系)生物学性状的主成分分析和聚类分析[J]. 花生学报, 2007, 36(2): 29-34. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1002-4093.2007.02.007.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-4093.2007.02.007 |
23 | 张晓杰, 姜慧芳, 任小平, 等. 中国花生核心种质的主成分分析及相关分析[J]. 中国油料作物学报, 2009, 31(3): 298-304. |
24 |
殷冬梅, 张幸果, 王允, 等. 花生主要品质性状的主成分分析与综合评价[J]. 植物遗传资源学报, 2011, 12(4): 507-512, 518. DOI:10.13430/j.cnki.jpgr.2011.04.007.
doi: 10.13430/j.cnki.jpgr.2011.04.007 |
25 |
高燕丽, 孙彦. 利用近红外光谱分析预测紫花苜蓿干草品质[J]. 草地学报, 2015, 23(5): 1080-1085. DOI:10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2015.05.027.
doi: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2015.05.027 |
26 |
王飞, 王建国, 李林, 等. 施钙与覆膜栽培对缺钙红壤花生Mg、Fe、Zn吸收, 积累及分配的影响[J]. 核农学报, 2019, 33(11): 2261-2270. DOI:10.11869/j.issn.100-8551.2019.11.2261.
doi: 10.11869/j.issn.100-8551.2019.11.2261 |
27 |
沈浦, 吴正锋, 王才斌, 等. 花生钙营养效应及其与磷协同吸收特征[J]. 中国油料作物学报, 2017, 39(1): 85-90. DOI:10.7505/j.issn.1007-9084.2017.01.013.
doi: 10.7505/j.issn.1007-9084.2017.01.013 |
28 |
吴文新, 陈家驹, 周恩生, 等. 钙、硼对花生生长、产量和品质的影响[J]. 亚热带植物科学, 2001, 30(2): 20-23. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1009-7791.2001.02.005.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-7791.2001.02.005 |
29 | 周录英, 李向东, 王丽丽, 等. 钙肥不同用量对花生生理特性及产量和品质的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2008, 34(5): 879-885. |
30 |
高芳, 张佳蕾, 杨传婷, 等. 钙对镉胁迫下花生生理特性、产量和品质的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2011, 22(11): 2907-2912. DOI:10.13287/j.1001-9332.2011.0407.
doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.2011.0407 |
31 |
周恩生, 陈家驹, 王飞, 等. 钙胁迫下花生荚果微区特征及植株生理生化反应变化[J]. 福建农业学报, 2008, 23(3): 318-321. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1008-0384.2008.03.022.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-0384.2008.03.022 |
32 |
徐仁扣, 李九玉, 周世伟, 等. 我国农田土壤酸化调控的科学问题与技术措施[J]. 中国科学院院刊, 2018, 33(2): 160-167. DOI:10.16418/j.issn.1000-3045.2018.02.005.
doi: 10.16418/j.issn.1000-3045.2018.02.005 |
33 |
张小琴, 陈娟, 高秀兵, 等. 贵州重点茶区茶园土壤pH值和主要养分分析[J]. 西南农业学报, 2015, 28(1): 286-291. DOI:10.16213/j.cnki.scjas.2015.01.054.
doi: 10.16213/j.cnki.scjas.2015.01.054 |
34 |
李渝, 刘彦伶, 黄兴成, 等. 贵州不同茶区土壤养分及微生物量分析评价[J]. 灌溉排水学报, 2018, 37(8): 98-105. DOI:10.13522/j.cnki.ggps.2017.0467.
doi: 10.13522/j.cnki.ggps.2017.0467 |
35 | 高菲菲. 云南省茶叶主产区茶园土壤养分状况分析与评价[D]. 昆明: 云南农业大学, 2013. |
36 |
颜鹏, 韩文炎, 李鑫, 等. 中国茶园土壤酸化现状与分析[J]. 中国农业科学, 2020, 53(4): 795-801. DOI:10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2020.04.011.
doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2020.04.011 |
37 |
林诚, 陈子聪, 吴一群, 等. 林地转变为茶园的土壤pH及养分变化特征[J]. 茶叶科学, 2020, 40(2): 186-193. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-369X.2020.02.005.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-369X.2020.02.005 |
38 |
吴刚, 李金英, 曾晓舵. 土壤钙的生物有效性及与其它元素的相互作用[J]. 土壤与环境, 2002, 11(3): 319-322. DOI:10.16258/j.cnki.1674-5906.2002.03.024.
doi: 10.16258/j.cnki.1674-5906.2002.03.024 |
[1] | Yang ZHOU, Xiao-feng YUE, Xiao-qian TANG, Hong-lin YAN, Qi ZHANG, Pei-wu LI. A preliminary study on the coupling effect of aflatoxin green control and super-nodulation [J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF OIL CROP SCIENCES, 2021, 43(6): 947-960. |
[2] | Feng-gao CUI, Xiao-hui HU, Hua-rong MIAO, Sheng-zhong ZHANG, Juan WANG, Song WANG, Gang HOU, Jie SUI, Jian-cheng ZHANG, Jing CHEN. QTL mapping for 100-pod and 100-seed weights in cultivated peanut [J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF OIL CROP SCIENCES, 2021, 43(6): 1025-1030. |
[3] | Kang CHEN. Effect of density and nitrogen fertilizer on SPAD, plant and pod yield characteristics under single seed planting in peanut [J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF OIL CROP SCIENCES, 2021, 43(6): 1070-1076. |
[4] | Yu DUAN, Xia FAN, Hao AN, Jun ZHANG, Jun-mei LIANG, Ting-ting ZHANG, Yu-peng JING, Bo WANG. Effect study on sunflower nutrient expert system for fertilization recommendation [J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF OIL CROP SCIENCES, 2021, 43(6): 1108-1114. |
[5] | Ju-xiang WU, Man-lin XU, Xia ZHANG, Jing YU, Zhi-qing GUO, Ying LI, Xin-ying SONG, Kang HE, Xin-guo LI, Ru-jun ZHOU, Yu-cheng CHI, Shu-bo WAN. Evaluation of resistance of Shandong peanut varieties to Sphaceloma arachidis [J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF OIL CROP SCIENCES, 2021, 43(6): 1126-1131. |
[6] | Dong-xin HUAI, Jie WU, Xiao-meng XUE, Fang LIU, Mei-ling HU, Li-ying YAN, Yu-ning CHEN, Xin WANG, Yan-ping KANG, Zhi-hui WANG, Nian LIU, Hui-fang JIANG, Yong LEI, Bo-shou LIAO. Development of a portable instrument for identifying high oleate peanut [J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF OIL CROP SCIENCES, 2021, 43(6): 1150-1158. |
[7] | XIE Chang, DANG Xian-shi, LIU Na, YAO Rui, YU Hai-qiu, WANG Jing, JIANG Chun-ji, ZHAO Xin-hua, WANG Xiao-guang. Quality formation characteristic of peanut varieties with different grain types [J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF OIL CROP SCIENCES, 2021, 43(5): 795-. |
[8] | XU Jing, PAN Li-juan, CHEN Na, WANG Tong, CHEN Ming-na, WANG Mian, YU Shan-lin, DING Hong, SUN Wei, ZHAO Xiao-dong, CHI Xiao-yuan. Pods mechanical property of different peanuts and identification of elite varieties(lines) [J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF OIL CROP SCIENCES, 2021, 43(5): 803-. |
[9] | CHEN Na, PAN Li-juan, CHEN Ming-na, WANG Tong, XU Jing, WANG Zi-qiang, YANG Zhen, XIE Hong-feng, ZOU Zong-feng, HUANG Xiang, HUANG Hui-wen, YU Shan-lin, CHI Xiao-yuan. Sequence and expression analysis of DREB transcription factor gene AhDREB3 in peanut under abiotic stress [J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF OIL CROP SCIENCES, 2021, 43(5): 816-. |
[10] | LIU Na, XIE Chang, GAO Shi-jie, YAO Rui, SONG Hai-ling, YU Hai-qiu, WANG Jing, JIANG Chun-ji, ZHAO Xin-hua, WANG Xiao-guang . Effect of different potassium levels on the photosynthetic characteristics and yield of peanut [J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF OIL CROP SCIENCES, 2021, 43(5): 883-. |
[11] | QIN Wen-jie, GUO Run-ze, ZOU Xiao-xia, ZHANG Xiao-jun, YU Xiao-na, WANG Yue-fu, SI Tong. Effects of fertilizer topdressing on growth and yield of peanut with drip irrigation under film [J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF OIL CROP SCIENCES, 2021, 43(5): 891-. |
[12] | JIN Xin-xin, SONG Ya-hui, WANG Jin, CHENG Zeng-shu, LI Yu-rong, CHEN Si-long. Effects of sowing dates on agronomic traits, yield, and quality of peanut [J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF OIL CROP SCIENCES, 2021, 43(5): 898-. |
[13] | LI Cong-cong, LI Nai-guang, WU Zheng-feng. Effects of high temperature and drought combined stress on physiological indexes of seedlings of different peanut varieties [J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF OIL CROP SCIENCES, 2021, 43(5): 906-. |
[14] | BI Jie, YU Li-na, WANG Ming-qing, SONG Yu, YANG Wei-qiang, JIANG Chen, SHI Cheng-ren, SUN Jie. Extraction and purification of flavonoids from peanut shell [J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF OIL CROP SCIENCES, 2021, 43(5): 933-. |
[15] | CHEN Hai-wen, XU Si-liang, GUO Jian-bin, CHEN Wei-gang, LUO Huai-yong, LIU Nian, HUANG Li, ZHOU Xiao-jing, WU Bei, JIANG Cheng-hong, REN Xiao-ping, JIANG Hui-fang. Identification and evaluation of resveratrol content in different peanut varieties [J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF OIL CROP SCIENCES, 2021, 43(5): 942-. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||