Response of yield and related traits of soybean varieties with different iron efficiency to Fe-EDDHA fertilizer in calcareous iron-deficient soils

doi:10.19802/j.issn.1007-9084.2021277

Abstract

Abstract:

Iron deficiency in calcareous soil is the main limiting factor of soybean yield. The aim of this study was to investigate the response of yield and related traits of soybean varieties with different iron efficiency to Fe-EDDHA fertilization under iron stress. Six varieties with different iron efficiency were applied with Fe-EDDHA at 5 fertilizer levels （0, 3, 6, 9, 12 and 15 kg·hm^-2） in a calcareous iron-deficient soil of Taonan of Jilin Province in 2014-2015. The effects of Fe-EDDHA on leaf SPAD, agronomic characteristics and yield of soybean varieties with different iron efficiency were studied. The results showed that in calcareous soil, there were significant differences in yield and related traits of varieties with different iron efficiency in response to Fe-EDDHA fertilization. In order to ensure the normal yield of soybean varieties with different iron efficiency, the demand for iron fertilizer increased gradually from iron efficient varieties to iron inefficient varieties, and Fe fertilizer was 0-3 kg·hm^-2 for iron-efficient varieties and 3-6 kg·hm^-2 for medium iron-effective varieties. Fe-EDDHA （6-9 kg·hm^-2） was applied to iron-ineffective varieties, and the increase of iron application rate had no significant effect on the yield of varieties with different iron efficiency. Iron-efficient and iron-inefficient varieties responded to iron fertilizer mainly in the late reproductive stage, while medium iron-effective varieties responded to iron fertilizer mainly through the change of chlorophyll content at vegetative period. The response of different varieties to iron fertilizer had a year effect, and more iron fertilizer should be applied in 2015 to achieve normal yield. In conclusion, the application of Fe efficient varieties in the Fe deficiency area of calcareous soil is the most economical and effective measure for iron deficiency correction, and a small amount of Fe-EDDHA fertilizer can be applied in the Fe deficiency area or in year of severe iron shortage to guarantee the yield.

Key words: soybean, iron efficiency, Fe-EDDHA, yield

CLC Number:

S565.1

Xi-guo HAN, Bo YANG, De-bin YU, Chang-hong XU, Fan-gang MENG, Qiang QIU, Jing ZHAO, Ming-hao ZHANG, Xiao-yan YAN, Wei ZHANG. Response of yield and related traits of soybean varieties with different iron efficiency to Fe-EDDHA fertilizer in calcareous iron-deficient soils[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF OIL CROP SCIENCES, 2022, 44(6): 1329-1336.

Figures/Tables 8

Fig. 1

Table 1

Table 2

Fig. 2

Table 3

Effects of different iron chelating doses on agronomic traits of soybean varieties with different iron efficiency

年份Year	品种 Varieties	Fe-EDDHA /（kg/ hm^-2）	株高 Plant height /cm	单株荚重 Pods weight per plant /g	单株粒重 Grain weight per plant /g	百粒重 100-seed weight /g
2014	铁高效 Iron-efficient	0	76.4±5.02aA	9.2±0.97aA	5.8±0.55aA	17.2±1.02aA
		3	80.9±2.93aA	9.1±0.87aA	5.9±0.45aA	17.4±0.96aA
		6	78.5±4.62aA	9.3±1.33aA	6.0±0.85aA	17.1±1.51aA
		9	80.0±5.36aA	8.8±1.10aA	5.7±0.51aA	17.6±1.47aA
		12	76.9±3.80aA	9.4±0.76aA	6.2±0.52aA	17.0±1.59aA
		15	76.1±6.45aA	9.1±0.79aA	5.9±0.47aA	16.8±1.89aA
	铁中效 Medium iron-efficient	0	67.5±11.73bB	7.0±0.66bB	4.5±0.32bB	17.2±1.20aA
		3	87.0±2.29aA	8.3±1.18aAB	5.4±0.78aAB	17.7±1.19aA
		6	90.8±6.75aA	8.2±1.16aAB	5.3±0.79aAB	17.6±1.46aA
		9	89.3±4.74aA	8.6±0.68aA	5.7±0.36aA	17.4±1.55aA
		12	86.8±6.76aA	8.0±1.08aAB	5.2±0.61aAB	16.8±1.78aA
		15	88.3±6.61aA	8.4±1.06aA	5.6±0.67aA	17.6±0.86aA
	铁低效 Iron-inefficient	0	0.0±0.00dD	0.0±0.00dD	0.0±0.00dD	0.0±0.00dC
		3	55.4±8.99cC	4.0±0.93cC	2.6±0.57cC	15.0±0.39cB
		6	69.2±7.67bB	6.2±0.70bB	4.0±0.52bB	16.3±0.57abAB
		9	83.2±5.58aA	7.9±0.92aA	5.2±0.69aA	17.0±0.30aA
		12	86.1±6.22aA	8.5±0.64aA	5.6±0.36aA	16.5±0.95abA
		15	84.4±5.16aA	8.1±0.48aA	5.4±0.28aA	16.8±1.06aA
2015	铁高效 Iron-efficient	0	70.3±6.77aA	7.5±0.52bB	4.8±0.39bB	17.3±1.79aA
		3	72.4±3.87aA	8.4±0.63aAB	5.6±0.43aA	17.0±1.77aA
		6	74.7±5.12aA	8.4±0.47aA	5.4±0.31aAB	17.2±1.78aA
		9	70.9±6.90aA	8.2±0.51aAB	5.3±0.38aAB	17.2±1.28aA
		12	73.2±2.94aA	8.6±0.77aA	5.5±0.48aA	16.8±1.67aA
		15	72.6±2.47aA	8.7±0.64aA	5.7±0.40aA	16.9±1.95aA
	铁中效 Medium iron-efficient	0	69.0±6.58dC	6.0±1.41dC	3.8±0.86dD	16.4±0.90bB
		3	79.36±3.76cB	6.8±1.10cBC	4.2±0.63cCD	17.3±1.04aAB
		6	86.8±3.19abA	7.6±0.60bAB	4.8±0.34bBC	18.0±1.05aA
		9	89.6±3.13aA	8.3±0.65aA	5.3±0.43aAB	18.0±0.97aA
		12	88.4±2.90abA	8.5±0.87aA	5.6±0.53aA	18.4±1.22aA
		15	89.0±3.58abA	8.4±0.79aA	5.4±0.50aAB	18.0±0.80aA
	铁低效 Iron-inefficient	0	0.0±0.00eE	0.00±0.00eE	0.0±0.00eE	0.0±0.00dC
		3	55.3±6.80dD	3.09±0.70dD	1.9±0.45dD	13.8±0.91cB
		6	68.3±6.91cC	5.52±0.64cC	3.4±0.38cC	15.8±1.38bA
		9	77.1±4.34bB	6.41±0.53bB	4.1±0.29bB	16.3±1.41abA
		12	88.4±4.26aA	7.65±0.59aA	4.8±0.33aA	17.3±1.66aA
		15	86.7±3.83aA	7.79±0.48aA	4.9±0.30aA	17.4±1.39aA

Table 3

Table 4

Fig. 3

Table 5

References 30

1	Atencio L， Salazar J， Moran Lauter A N， et al. Characterizing short and long term iron stress responses in iron deficiency tolerant and susceptible soybean （Glycine max L. Merr.）［J］. Plant Stress， 2021， 2： 100012. DOI：10.1016/j.stress.2021.100012 . doi: 10.1016/j.stress.2021.100012
2	Assefa T， Zhang J P， Chowda-Reddy R V， et al. Deconstructing the genetic architecture of iron deficiency chlorosis in soybean using genome-wide approaches［J］. BMC Plant Biol， 2020， 20（1）： 42. DOI：10.1186/s12870-020-2237-5 . doi: 10.1186/s12870-020-2237-5
3	Hashemimajd K， Golchin A. The effect of iron-enriched vermicompost on growth and nutrition of tomato［J］. J Agric Sci Technol， 2009， 11（5）： 613-621.
4	张伟，赵婧，邱强，等. 石灰性土壤上大豆耐低铁品种的鉴定指标研究［J］. 大豆科学， 2016， 35（5）： 760-765. DOI：10.11861/j.issn.1000-9841.2016.05.0760 . doi: 10.11861/j.issn.1000-9841.2016.05.0760
5	Hansen N C， Schmitt M A， Anderson J E， et al. Iron deficiency of soybean in the upper Midwest and associated soil properties［J］. Agron J， 2003， 95（6）： 1595-1601. DOI：10.2134/agronj2003.1595 . doi: 10.2134/agronj2003.1595
6	Gamble A V， Howe J A， Delaney D， et al. Iron chelates alleviate iron chlorosis in soybean on high pH soils［J］. Agron J， 2014， 106（4）： 1251-1257. DOI：10.2134/agronj13.0474 . doi: 10.2134/agronj13.0474
7	Kaiser B N， Moreau S， Castelli J， et al. The soybean NRAMP homologue， GmDMT1， is a symbiotic divalent metal transporter capable of ferrous iron transport［J］. Plant J， 2003， 35（3）： 295-304. DOI：10.1046/j.1365-313x.2003.01802.x . doi: 10.1046/j.1365-313x.2003.01802.x
8	Liesch A M， Diaz D A R， Martin K L， et al. Management strategies for increasing soybean yield on soils susceptible to iron deficiency［J］. Agron J， 2011， 103（6）： 1870-1877. DOI：10.2134/agronj2011.0191 . doi: 10.2134/agronj2011.0191
9	Àlvarez-Fernàndez A， Abadía J， Abadía A. Iron deficiency， fruit yield and fruit quality［M］//Iron Nutrition in Plants and Rhizospheric Microorganisms. Dordrecht： Springer Netherlands， 2006： 85-101. DOI：10.1007/1-4020-4743-6_4 . doi: 10.1007/1-4020-4743-6_4
10	Schenkeveld W D C， Temminghoff E J M. The Effectiveness of FeEDDHA Chelates in Mending and Preventing Iron Chlorosis in Soil-Grown Soybean Plants［M］.Soybean Physiology and Biochemistry， Prof.Hany El-Shemy （Ed.）， ISBN： 978- 953-307-534-1， InTech， Available from： .
11	Helms T C， Scott R A， Schapaugh W T， et al. Soybean iron-deficiency chlorosis tolerance and yield decrease on calcareous soils［J］. Agron J， 2010， 102（2）： 492-498. DOI：10.2134/agronj2009.0317 . doi: 10.2134/agronj2009.0317
12	Godsey C B， Schmidt J P， Schlegel A J， et al. Correcting iron deficiency in corn with seed row-applied iron sulfate［J］. Agron J， 2003， 95（1）： 160. DOI：10.2134/agronj2003.0160 . doi: 10.2134/agronj2003.0160
13	Hergert G W， Nordquist P T， Petersen J L， et al. Fertilizer and crop management practices for improving maize yields on high pH soils［J］. J Plant Nutr， 1996， 19（8/9）： 1223-1233. DOI：10.1080/01904169609365193 . doi: 10.1080/01904169609365193
14	Wiersma J V. High rates of Fe-EDDHA and seed iron concentration suggest partial solutions to iron deficiency in soybean［J］. Agron J， 2005， 97（3）： 924-934. DOI：10.2134/agronj2004.0309 . doi: 10.2134/agronj2004.0309
15	Goos R J， Johnson B. Seed treatment， seeding rate， and cultivar effects on iron deficiency chlorosis of soybean［J］. J Plant Nutr， 2001， 24（8）： 1255-1268. DOI：10.1081/pln-100106980 . doi: 10.1081/pln-100106980
16	Modaihsh A S. Foliar application of chelated and non-chelated metals for supplying micronutrients to wheat grown on calcareous soil［J］. Ex Agric， 1997， 33（2）： 237-245. DOI：10.1017/s001447979700001x . doi: 10.1017/s001447979700001x
17	Wiersma J V. Iron acquisition of three soybean varieties grown at five seeding densities and five rates of Fe-EDDHA［J］. Agron J， 2007， 99（4）： 1018-1028. DOI：10.2134/agronj2006.0271 . doi: 10.2134/agronj2006.0271
18	O'Rourke J A， Charlson D V， Gonzalez D O， et al. Microarray analysis of iron deficiency chlorosis in near-isogenic soybean lines［J］. BMC Genom， 2007， 8： 476. DOI：10.1186/1471-2164-8-476 . doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-8-476
19	Kaiser D E， Lamb J A， Bloom P R. 2011. Managing iron deficiency chlorosis in soybean［M］. Publ. AG-FO-08672-A. Univ. of MN Ext.， St. Paul.
20	Goos R J， Johnson B E. A comparison of three methods for reducing iron-deficiency chlorosis in soybean［J］. Agron J， 2000， 92（6）： 1135-1139. DOI：10.2134/agronj2000.9261135x . doi: 10.2134/agronj2000.9261135x
21	de Kreij C. Exchange of iron from chelate in the fertilizer against copper， manganese， and zinc in peaty substrates［J］. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal， 1998， 29（11/12/13/14）： 1897-1902. DOI：10.1080/00103629809370079 . doi: 10.1080/00103629809370079
22	Tills A R. Chelates in horticulture［J］. Prof Hortic， 1987， 1（4）： 120-125.
23	Reed D W， 1996. Micronutrient nutrition. In： REED D.W.（ed.）， Water， Media， and Nutrition for Greenhouse Crops［M］. Batavia， Ball Publishing： 171-195.
24	张伟，赵丽梅，韩喜国，等. 吉林省白城地区大豆黄叶原因分析［J］. 河南农业科学， 2011， 40（11）： 57-59. DOI：10.3969/j.issn.1004-3268.2011.11.015 . doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-3268.2011.11.015
25	张伟，赵丽梅，韩喜国，等. 石灰性土壤大豆缺铁矫正［J］. 大豆科学， 2011， 30（3）： 463-467.
26	张伟，邱强，赵婧，等.石灰性土壤上大豆耐低铁品种的鉴定指标研究［J］. 大豆科学，2016，41（4）：8-13.
27	Chen J， Shang Y T， Zhang N N， et al. Sodium hydrosulfide modifies the nutrient ratios of soybean （Glycine max） under iron deficiency［J］. J Plant Nutr Soil Sci， 2018， 181（2）： 305-315. DOI：10.1002/jpln.201700262 . doi: 10.1002/jpln.201700262
28	赵婧，邱强，张鸣浩，等. 大豆在不同铁水平下生理特性与品种耐性的关系［J］. 核农学报， 2016， 30（11）： 2239-2247. DOI：10.11869/j.issn.100-8551.2016.11.2239 . doi: 10.11869/j.issn.100-8551.2016.11.2239
29	Xu Z Y， Kurek A， Cannon S B， et al. Predictions from algorithmic modeling result in better decisions than from data modeling for soybean iron deficiency chlorosis［J］. PLoS One， 2021， 16（7）： e0240948. DOI：10.1371/journal.pone.0240948 . doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0240948
30	Zuo Y， Ren L， Zhang F， et al. Bicarbonate concentration as affected by soil water content controls iron nutrition of peanut plants in a calcareous soil［J］. Plant Physiol Biochem， 2007， 45（5）： 357-364. DOI：10.1016/j.plaphy.2007.03.017 . doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2007.03.017

品种类型 Variety type	品种 Variety	产量 Yield /（kg·667m^-2）
品种类型 Variety type	品种 Variety	2014	2015
铁高效Iron-efficient	吉育99 Jiyu 99	170.2 ± 11.9aA	149.9 ± 5.9aA
	长农20 Changnong 20	170.2 ± 6.2aA	140.9 ± 4.0aA
铁中效Medium iron-efficient	九农36 Jiunong 36	148.5 ± 9.7bA	88.8 ± 2.6bB
	吉育100 Jiyu 100	147.3 ± 5.3bA	95.4 ± 6.0bB
铁低效Iron-inefficient	吉育85 Jiyu 85	0.0 ± 0.0cB	0.0 ± 0.0cC
	吉育93 Jiyu 93	0.0 ± 0.0cB	0.0 ± 0.0cC

变异来源 Source of variation	V3				R2
变异来源 Source of variation	平方和 Sum of squares（SS）	均方 Mean square （MS）	F值 F value	P值 P value	平方和 Sum of squares（SS）	均方 Mean square （MS）	F值 F value	P值 P value
区组 Block	12.7	2.5			26.4	5.3
年份Year （Y）	67.3	67.3	13.2	0.015	11.1	11.1	3.8	0.110
误差Residual	25.5	5.1			14.8	3.0
品种Variety （V）	2078.3	1039.1	93.7	0.000	5，428.4	2714.2	273.3	0.000
年份×品种（Y×V）	160.8	80.4	7.3	0.004	142.6	71.3	7.2	0.005
误差Residual	221.8	11.1			198.7	10.0
铁肥处理Fe treatment（Fe）	3526.4	705.3	112.5	0.000	5，159.5	1031.9	149.0	0.000
年份×铁处理（Y×Fe）	106.7	21.3	3.7	0.003	83.2	16.6	2.4	0.040
品种×铁处理（V×Fe）	1558.1	155.8	27.1	0.000	6，371.1	637.1	92.0	0.000
年份×品种×铁处理（Y×V×Fe）	358.3	35.8	6.2	0.000	326.4	32.6	4.7	0.000
误差Residual	863.8	5.8			1038.7	7.0
总和 Total	8979.7				18，800.9

变异来源 Source of variation	平方和 Sum of squares（SS）	均方 Mean square （MS）	F值 F value	P值 P value
区组 Block	1804.4	360.9
年份Year （Y）	22444.7	22444.7	243.6	0.000
误差Residual	460.6	92.1
品种Variety （V）	172468.5	86234.2	5959.3	0.000
年份×品种（Y×V）	2900.9	1450.5	100.2	0.000
误差Residual	289.4	14.5
铁肥处理Fe treatment（Fe）	105170.5	21034.1	691.7	0.000
年份×铁处理（Y×Fe）	3101.6	620.3	20.4	0.000
品种×铁处理（V×Fe）	91769.2	9176.9	301.8	0.000
年份×品种×铁处理（Y×V×Fe）	8610.3	861.0	28.3	0.000
误差Residual	4561.4	30.4
总和 Total	413581.5

[1]	Jing-xiu YE, Hai-dong LIU, Xiao-rong XING, Jun LI, De-zhi DU. Relationship between chlorophyll content and yield and development of chlorophyll major QTL cqSPDA2 linkage marker in Brassica napus [J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF OIL CROP SCIENCES, 2022, 44(6): 1173-1181.
[2]	Chao-sen ZHAO, Xian-wei ZHAO, Rui-zhen WANG. Evolution of important agronomic traits of vegetable summer soybean varieties attending national regional test [J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF OIL CROP SCIENCES, 2022, 44(6): 1218-1227.
[3]	Bo WANG, Ying-ying DONG, Xue FU, He-yu LIU, Xiang-chao ZHANG, Ji LIU, Fei-fei SHI, Xue ZHAO, Ying-peng HAN, Wen-bin LI, Wei-li TENG. Construction of high density genetic map and QTL mapping of yield related traits in soybean [J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF OIL CROP SCIENCES, 2022, 44(6): 1228-1238.
[4]	Li-long HOU, Hong-wei JIANG, Xin XIONG, Hai-yang ZHENG, Fu-bin CAO, Ru-ru WEI, Yi-chao ZHANG, Yu-xuan ZHAO, Meng-yao GUO, Qing-shan CHEN. Development and verification of molecular markers for QTLs related to the number of three-seeded pods in soybean [J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF OIL CROP SCIENCES, 2022, 44(6): 1239-1248.
[5]	Wen-tian HU, Cai-jin WANG, Jing-hong DU, Yang WANG. Exploration of elite alleles on vigor-related traits in soybean at seed stage [J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF OIL CROP SCIENCES, 2022, 44(6): 1249-1258.
[6]	Ying ZHAI, Ting-ting MA, Jia-qi HE, Jun ZHANG, Ming-yang LI, Jiong-xin CHEN, Hai-wei YU, Shan-shan LI, Tian-guo SUN. Soybean GmDof2.2 improved the sensitivity of transgenic tobacco to salt stress [J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF OIL CROP SCIENCES, 2022, 44(6): 1259-1266.
[7]	Qing-wei FANG, Yan-zheng ZHANG, Ji-qiang ZHENG, Ze-yang LI, Yue LI, Jia-liang ZHAO, Xue-song WANG, Xing-chao CHANG, Long CHEN, Ya JING, Chun-xiao SONG, Yong-guang LI. Analysis of salt tolerance function of GmLecRlk gene in soybean [J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF OIL CROP SCIENCES, 2022, 44(6): 1267-1274.
[8]	SACHURULA, BADUMUCAICIKE, Rui-lin TIAN, Zhan-ming HOU, Zhen-xing WANG. Effects of peanut, soybean and carrot as feed on development and adult survival of Dolycoris baccarum [J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF OIL CROP SCIENCES, 2022, 44(6): 1337-1340.
[9]	Yong-fang ZHANG, Ming-ming WANG, Li-hua ZHAO, Dong-xu ZHANG, Yong-fang JIA, Jian-min WANG, Ke-ying LI, Ling-xin CHEN. Comparison of nutrient composition changes of different soybean varieties during germination [J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF OIL CROP SCIENCES, 2022, 44(6): 1368-1374.
[10]	Su-qi JIAO, Jun-ming ZHOU, Yu-qing SHANG, Jia-xin WANG, Ai-jing ZHANG, Hao-bo HE, Qiu-zhu ZHAO, Yue LI, Dan YAO. Cloning and genetic transformation of soybean fatty acid dehydrogenase GmFAD3C-1 gene [J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF OIL CROP SCIENCES, 2022, 44(5): 1006-1017.
[11]	Chun-juan YAN, Shu-hong SONG, Chang-ling WANG, Xu-gang SUN, Yong-qiang CAO, Li-jun ZHANG, Li ZHANG, Xiao-yang HUO, Wen-bin WANG. Effect of water stress in different phases on photosynthetic characteristics of drought-avoidant soybean [J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF OIL CROP SCIENCES, 2022, 44(5): 1048-1056.
[12]	Xian-xu WANG, Hui-ming FAN, Ran OU, Lei WANG, Sui WANG, Yan JIANG, Shao-dong WANG. Methylene blue and β-carotene double fading method in soybean breeding of lipoxygenase free [J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF OIL CROP SCIENCES, 2022, 44(5): 1123-1129.
[13]	Cheng CUI, Hao-jie LI, Jin-fang ZHANG, Ben-chuan ZHENG, Liang CHAI, Jun JIANG, Ka ZHANG, Hai-yan QIN, Zai-yun LI, Liang-cai JIANG. Preliminary study on Songyou 2 for oilseeds and cruciferous vegetable [J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF OIL CROP SCIENCES, 2022, 44(5): 973-980.
[14]	Shi-hua XIANG, Hao YANG, Hong-yan YANG, Hua-wei YANG, Lin YU, Ya-bin HAN, Qing-yuan HE. Identification and genome-wide association analysis for tolerance to acid aluminum using Sichuan and Chongqing soybean germplasm [J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF OIL CROP SCIENCES, 2022, 44(5): 981-988.
[15]	Chao MA, Miao-xin GUO, Sheng-nan MA, Yue WANG, Yu-tian SUN, Da-wei XIN, Qing-shan CHEN, Jin-hui WANG. Construction of HH103ΩNopAAΩNopD and effect of mutation on nodulation ability of soybean rhizobium [J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF OIL CROP SCIENCES, 2022, 44(5): 989-995.