CHINESE JOURNAL OF OIL CROP SCIENCES ›› 2022, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (6): 1218-1227.doi: 10.19802/j.issn.1007-9084.2021281
Previous Articles Next Articles
Chao-sen ZHAO(), Xian-wei ZHAO, Rui-zhen WANG(
)
Received:
2021-11-04
Online:
2022-12-25
Published:
2022-11-24
Contact:
Rui-zhen WANG
E-mail:zcssoybean@163.com;dadouzu@163.com
CLC Number:
Chao-sen ZHAO, Xian-wei ZHAO, Rui-zhen WANG. Evolution of important agronomic traits of vegetable summer soybean varieties attending national regional test[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF OIL CROP SCIENCES, 2022, 44(6): 1218-1227.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: http://www.jouroilcrops.cn/EN/10.19802/j.issn.1007-9084.2021281
Table 1
The number of tested lines and breeding institutions in the national vegetable summer soybean regional trials from 2006 to 2018
年份 Year | 参试品种数 Tested lines | 推荐审定数 Recommended released lines | 省份 Province | 选育单位数 Breeding institutions | 选育参试品种数 Breeding tested lines |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2006 | 12 | 0 | 江苏Jiangsu | 4 | 26 |
2007 | 8 | 1 | 浙江Zhejiang | 2 | 10 |
2008 | 5 | 2 | 湖北Hubei | 2 | 6 |
2009 | 4 | 0 | 辽宁Liaoning | 4 | 5 |
2010 | 3 | 0 | 河南Henan | 3 | 4 |
2011 | 10 | 1 | 安徽Anhui | 2 | 4 |
2012 | 5 | 0 | 广东Guangdong | 1 | 3 |
2013 | 8 | 1 | 江西Jiangxi | 2 | 3 |
2014 | 7 | 0 | 山西Shanxi | 2 | 2 |
2015 | 5 | 0 | 云南Yunnan | 1 | 2 |
2016 | 5 | 1 | 福建Fujian | 1 | 1 |
2017 | 7 | 0 | 山东Shandong | 1 | 1 |
2018 | 6 | 2 | 四川Sichuan | 1 | 1 |
合计Summer | 85 | 8 | 26 | 68 |
Table 2
Vegetable summer soybean varieties approved by the state
品种名称 Variety | 鲜荚 产量 FPY /(kg·hm-2) | 采青 天数 FPHD/d | 株高 PH/cm | 主茎 节数 NOMS | 单株 有效 分枝数 EBPP | 单株 有效 鲜荚数 EFPPP | 多粒 荚率 MSPR/% | 单株鲜 荚重 FPWPP | 百粒 鲜重 FSW/g | 500g 标准 荚数 SPN | 标准二粒 荚长 SPL/cm | 标准二粒 荚宽 SPW/cm | 标准 荚率 SPR/% | A级口 感率 GATQR/% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
油03-68You03-68 | 10980.0 | 81.5 | 53.7 | 12.3 | 2.1 | 31.4 | 59.8 | 65.4 | 58.7 | 224.5 | 4.82 | 1.22 | 59.8 | 60.9 |
通豆2006 Tongdou2006 | 12230.0 | 99.5 | 76.3 | 15.7 | 2.1 | 42.1 | 76.6 | 96.6 | 65.9 | 199.5 | 5.40 | 1.35 | 69.4 | 36.1 |
衢9902-5 Qu9902-5 | 11502.0 | 88.5 | 78.2 | 18.5 | 1.7 | 29.4 | 67.3 | 77.1 | 67.4 | 178.0 | 5.35 | 1.35 | 61.7 | 70.9 |
晋豆39 Jindou39 | 9936.0 | 86.0 | 49.2 | 12.2 | 2.0 | 30.8 | 62.1 | 64.4 | 76.0 | 187.0 | 5.30 | 1.30 | 65.9 | 77.8 |
南农J001 NannongJ001 | 11897.0 | 90.5 | 73.1 | 16.2 | 2.1 | 39.0 | 72.4 | 83.1 | 68.2 | 196.5 | 5.60 | 1.30 | 70.5 | 56.4 |
苏7辐选Su7fuxuan | 11292.0 | 77.5 | 43.9 | 11.9 | 1.6 | 24.5 | 63.9 | 64.4 | 78.9 | 174.0 | 5.60 | 1.30 | 69.7 | 66.7 |
南农46 Nannong46 | 12265.0 | 86.5 | 69.1 | 14.5 | 1.0 | 22.6 | 73.7 | 55.3 | 68.9 | 165.5 | 5.85 | 1.35 | 73.9 | 55.0 |
浙鲜0840 Zhexian0840 | 11616.0 | 95.5 | 74.8 | 16.9 | 1.9 | 29.0 | 58.5 | 82.6 | 84.3 | 155.0 | 6.35 | 1.45 | 62.1 | 66.3 |
平均值Mean | 11465.0 | 88.2 | 64.8 | 14.8 | 1.8 | 31.1 | 66.8 | 73.6 | 71.0 | 185.0 | 5.53 | 1.33 | 66.6 | 61.2 |
Table 3
Variation of agronomic traits of vegetable summer soybean in national regional trials from 2006 to 2018
性状 Trait | 最小值 Minimum | 最大值 Maximum | 平均值 Mean | 标准差 Standard deviation | 变异系数 Coefficient of variation / % |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
鲜荚产量FPY /(kg·hm-2) | 7050.0 | 12783.0 | 10738.9 | 1234.32 | 11.49 |
采青天数FPHD / d | 75.0 | 112.0 | 89.7 | 7.91 | 8.82 |
株高PH /cm | 31.0 | 112.2 | 62.5 | 16.03 | 25.63 |
主茎节数NOMS | 9.3 | 24.5 | 14.4 | 2.75 | 19.09 |
单株有效分枝数EBPP | 0.9 | 4.0 | 2.3 | 0.73 | 32.44 |
单株有效鲜荚数EFPPP | 19.1 | 44.1 | 32.2 | 6.18 | 19.19 |
多粒荚率MSPR /% | 42.6 | 81.4 | 62.0 | 7.61 | 12.26 |
单株鲜荚重 FPWPP /g | 41.0 | 114.8 | 75.8 | 14.25 | 18.80 |
百粒鲜重 FSW /g | 46.9 | 101.2 | 70.5 | 10.64 | 15.10 |
500 g标准荚数SPN | 133.0 | 306.0 | 191.4 | 33.44 | 17.47 |
标准二粒荚长SPL / cm | 4.5 | 6.6 | 5.6 | 0.50 | 9.00 |
标准二粒荚宽 SPW / cm | 1.2 | 1.6 | 1.3 | 0.09 | 6.75 |
标准荚率 SPR /% | 46.4 | 75.9 | 63.6 | 6.87 | 10.80 |
A级口感率 GATQR /% | 0.0 | 100.0 | 49.9 | 19.31 | 38.67 |
Table 4
Change of fresh pod yield of vegetable summer soybean in the national regional trials from 2006 to 2018
年份 Year | 最小值 /(kg·hm-2) Minimum | 最大值 /(kg·hm-2) Maximum | 平均值 /(kg·hm-2) Mean | 对照品种平均值 /(kg·hm-2) The mean fresh pod yield of CK | 增产率/ % Rate of growth |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2006 | 8125.5 | 11727.0 | 10468.9ab | 10367.3 | 0.98 |
2007 | 9931.5 | 12481.5 | 11393.6a | 10704.8 | 6.44 |
2008 | 9975.0 | 11979.0 | 10783.2ab | 10916.3 | -1.22 |
2009 | 8383.5 | 10807.5 | 9515.6bc | 10347.8 | -8.04 |
2010 | 8008.5 | 10521.0 | 9493.5bc | 9852.0 | -3.64 |
2011 | 8772.0 | 12783.0 | 11121.5a | 11697.0 | -4.92 |
2012 | 7669.5 | 12628.5 | 10828.5ab | 11346.0 | -4.56 |
2013 | 8364.0 | 12030.0 | 10886.6ab | 11633.3 | -6.42 |
2014 | 7050.0 | 10819.5 | 9070.3c | 9786.0 | -7.31 |
2015 | 10807.5 | 12132.0 | 11616.0a | 11610.0 | 0.05 |
2016 | 10713.0 | 12417.0 | 11499.9a | 11016.8 | 4.39 |
2017 | 9882.0 | 12112.5 | 11249.4a | 11471.3 | -1.93 |
2018 | 9769.5 | 11784.0 | 10884.5ab | 10461.8 | 4.04 |
平均Mean | 9034.7 | 11863.3 | 10468.9 | 10862.3 | -1.70 |
2016-2010 | 10331.0 | 10437.6 | 5.46 | ||
2011-2018 | 10894.6 | 11127.8 | 6.61 |
Table 5
Changes of main agronomic traits of vegetable summer soybean lines in the national regional trials from 2006 to 2018
年份 Year | 采青天数 FPHD/ d | 株高 PH / cm | 主茎节数 NOMS | 单株有效分枝 EBPP | 单株有效鲜荚数EFPPP | 多粒荚率 MSPR/% | 单株鲜荚重 FPWPP/g | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
参试品种 Tested line | 对照 CK | 参试品种 Tested line | 对照 CK | 参试品种 Tested line | 对照 CK | 参试品种 Tested line | 对照 CK | 参试品种 Tested line | 对照 CK | 参试品种 Tested line | 对照 CK | 参试品种 Tested line | 对照 CK | |
2006 | 93.3ab | 92.0 | 65.9ab | 62.9 | 14.2ab | 14.6 | 3.0a | 2.6 | 32.5abcde | 35.5 | 56.8c | 60.8 | 80.4abc | 84.2 |
2007 | 96.6a | 97.0 | 68.7ab | 67.9 | 14.9ab | 14.6 | 2.7ab | 2.5 | 37.5ab | 35.1 | 59.9c | 54.1 | 86.3a | 83.7 |
2008 | 87.0ab | 89.5 | 68.3ab | 63.2 | 15.9ab | 14.2 | 2.2bcd | 2.6 | 34.5abc | 33.9 | 70.3ab | 63.7 | 76.4abc | 73.0 |
2009 | 91.5ab | 95.5 | 56.1ab | 69.1 | 12.6b | 14.6 | 2.7ab | 2.4 | 39.1a | 35.4 | 61.6abc | 64.4 | 66.1bc | 70.2 |
2010 | 84.3b | 94.5 | 58.0ab | 64.5 | 14.7ab | 13.8 | 2.4abcd | 2.7 | 29.0cdef | 30.8 | 59.1c | 61.8 | 62.1c | 70.7 |
2011 | 86.3ab | 89.0 | 60.9ab | 81.8 | 13.9ab | 16.4 | 2.5abc | 1.9 | 35.9ab | 30.5 | 63.2abc | 67.7 | 77.4abc | 75.2 |
2012 | 87.6ab | 91.0 | 56.1ab | 62.2 | 14.6ab | 15.2 | 2.3abcd | 2.1 | 32.1bcde | 30.0 | 60.8bc | 59.2 | 69.5abc | 78.3 |
2013 | 92.8ab | 95.0 | 51.0b | 68.3 | 13.8ab | 18.6 | 2.0bcde | 1.4 | 33.9abcd | 30.7 | 59.4c | 61.6 | 79.3abc | 77.0 |
2014 | 90.0ab | 90.0 | 69.6ab | 77.8 | 14.9ab | 16.5 | 1.8cde | 1.7 | 24.9f | 26.1 | 61.1abc | 63.8 | 63.1c | 71.4 |
2015 | 85.0b | 88.0 | 51.9b | 65.5 | 12.8b | 15.7 | 2.2bcd | 1.9 | 29.2cdef | 29.7 | 62.5abc | 65.0 | 83.6ab | 84.0 |
2016 | 90.8ab | 91.5 | 56.5ab | 69.9 | 13.9ab | 17.2 | 1.8cde | 1.5 | 25.9ef | 26.3 | 61.8abc | 62.0 | 69.6abc | 66.7 |
2017 | 84.7b | 88.0 | 64.8ab | 80.9 | 14.5ab | 17.7 | 1.4e | 1.4 | 27.2def | 29.2 | 64.6abc | 67.6 | 72.9abc | 79.5 |
2018 | 88.8ab | 92.0 | 75.7a | 84.0 | 16.9a | 18.8 | 1.7de | 1.9 | 33.4abcd | 30.9 | 70.6a | 66.1 | 80.4abc | 80.2 |
平均Mean | 89.1 | 91.8 | 61.8 | 70.6 | 14.4 | 16.0 | 2.2 | 2.0 | 31.9 | 31.1 | 62.4 | 62.9 | 74.4 | 76.4 |
2006-2010 | 90.5 | 93.7 | 63.4 | 65.5 | 14.5 | 14.3 | 2.6 | 2.5 | 34.5 | 34.1 | 61.5 | 60.9 | 74.3 | 76.4 |
2011-2018 | 88.3 | 90.6 | 60.8 | 73.8 | 14.4 | 17.0 | 2.0 | 1.7 | 30.3 | 29.1 | 63.0 | 64.1 | 74.5 | 76.5 |
Table 6
Changes of pod and quality traits of vegetable summer soybean in the national regional trials from 2006 to 2018
年份 Year | 百粒鲜重 FSW /g | 500 g标准荚数 SPN | 标准二粒荚长 SPL /cm | 标准二粒荚宽 SPW /cm | 标准荚率 SPR /% | A级口感率 GATQR /% | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
参试品种 Tested line | 对照 CK | 参试品种 Tested line | 对照 CK | 参试品种 Tested line | 对照 CK | 参试品种 Tested line | 对照 CK | 参试品种 Tested line | 对照 CK | 参试品种 Tested line | 对照 CK | |
2006 | 67.1abcde | 63.4 | 194.8bcd | 219.0 | 5.59abc | 5.30 | 1.37ab | 1.29 | 58.8cd | 62.1 | 49.3ab | 31.3 |
2007 | 63.6de | 68.6 | 203.3bc | 202.0 | 5.28bcd | 5.50 | 1.31abc | 1.35 | 63.2bcd | 58.5 | 41.7b | 44.5 |
2008 | 66.9bcde | 69.3 | 205.6bc | 210.0 | 5.32bcd | 5.45 | 1.30abc | 1.35 | 64.3abcd | 66.1 | 60.0ab | 25.0 |
2009 | 58.6e | 65.6 | 252.3a | 213.5 | 4.90d | 5.50 | 1.28bc | 1.35 | 64.4abcd | 62.3 | 47.2ab | 27.8 |
2010 | 65.1cde | 70.0 | 216.0b | 201.0 | 5.20cd | 5.50 | 1.23c | 1.35 | 57.8d | 58.0 | 37.0b | 27.8 |
2011 | 72.4abcd | 80.5 | 190.2bcd | 162.0 | 5.52abc | 5.85 | 1.36ab | 1.40 | 61.3cd | 68.3 | 42.9b | 50.0 |
2012 | 65.7cde | 82.3 | 212.0b | 157.0 | 5.56abc | 6.20 | 1.30abc | 1.50 | 59.5cd | 56.0 | 42.2b | 33.3 |
2013 | 71.3abcde | 73.1 | 188.8bcd | 165.0 | 5.86ab | 5.85 | 1.34abc | 1.35 | 61.9bcd | 60.0 | 42.9b | 50.0 |
2014 | 77.3abc | 79.3 | 179.3bcd | 164.0 | 5.43bcd | 5.45 | 1.37ab | 1.40 | 65.3abcd | 67.8 | 55.6ab | 77.8 |
2015 | 79.1ab | 78.5 | 172.4cd | 168.5 | 5.80abc | 5.65 | 1.36ab | 1.40 | 69.7ab | 67.8 | 62.2ab | 61.2 |
2016 | 80.3a | 78.1 | 159.8d | 171.5 | 6.10a | 5.90 | 1.42a | 1.35 | 66.9abc | 64.8 | 70.0a | 55.0 |
2017 | 75.7abcd | 80.4 | 162.9d | 156.5 | 5.86ab | 5.85 | 1.36ab | 1.35 | 67.2abc | 71.6 | 57.1ab | 62.5 |
2018 | 70.4abcde | 76.9 | 182.2bcd | 171.0 | 5.53abc | 5.55 | 1.37ab | 1.40 | 71.6a | 68.6 | 47.9ab | 43.8 |
平均Mean | 70.3 | 74.3 | 193.8 | 181.6 | 5.53 | 5.66 | 1.34 | 1.4 | 64.0 | 64.0 | 50.5 | 45.4 |
2006-2010 | 64.2 | 67.3 | 214.4 | 209.1 | 5.26 | 5.45 | 1.30 | 1.34 | 61.7 | 61.4 | 47.0 | 31.2 |
2011-2018 | 74.0 | 78.6 | 180.9 | 164.4 | 5.71 | 5.79 | 1.36 | 1.39 | 65.4 | 65.6 | 52.6 | 54.2 |
Table 7
Correlation of the traits of vegetable summer soybean in the national regional trials from 2006 to 2018
性状 Trait | 鲜荚 产量 FPY | 采青 天数 FPHD | 株高 PH | 主茎 节数 NOMS | 单株有效 分枝数 EBPP | 单株有效 鲜荚数 EFPPP | 多粒 荚率 MSPR | 单株鲜 荚重 FPWPP | 百粒 鲜重 FSW | 500g标 准荚数 SPN | 标准二粒 荚长 SPL | 标准二粒 荚宽 SPW | 标准 荚率 SPR | A级口 感率 GATQR |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
鲜荚产量FPY | 1.00 | |||||||||||||
采青天数FPHD | 0.15 | 1.00 | ||||||||||||
株高PH | 0.16 | 0.59** | 1.00 | |||||||||||
主茎节数NOMS | 0.13 | 0.53** | 0.91** | 1.00 | ||||||||||
单株有效分枝数EBPP | -0.02 | 0.34** | -0.04 | -0.11 | 1.00 | |||||||||
单株有效鲜荚数EFPPP | 0.21 | 0.42** | 0.31** | 0.29** | 0.50** | 1.00 | ||||||||
多粒荚率MSPR | 0.39** | -0.16 | 0.15 | 0.12 | -0.35** | 0.15 | 1.00 | |||||||
单株鲜荚重FPWPP | 0.59** | 0.63** | 0.44** | 0.40** | 0.36** | 0.55** | 0.06 | 1.00 | ||||||
百粒鲜重FSW | 0.29** | 0.16 | 0.04 | 0.08 | -0.14 | -0.42** | -0.19 | 0.32** | 1.00 | |||||
500g标准荚数SPN | -0.50** | -0.13 | -0.12 | -0.12 | 0.25* | 0.44** | -0.03 | -0.40** | -0.86** | 1.00 | ||||
标准二粒荚荚长SPL | 0.57** | 0.26* | 0.02 | 0.02 | -0.03 | -0.27* | 0.04 | 0.49** | 0.71** | -0.82** | 1.00 | |||
标准二粒荚荚宽SPW | 0.35** | 0.42** | 0.18 | 0.14 | 0.08 | -0.22* | -0.07 | 0.49** | 0.78** | -0.76** | 0.74** | 1.00 | ||
标准荚率SPR | 0.46** | -0.02 | 0.19 | 0.11 | -0.30** | 0.10 | 0.71** | 0.23* | 0.11 | -0.22* | 0.22* | 0.12 | 1.00 | |
A级口感率GATQR | 0.10 | -0.05 | 0.09 | 0.12 | -0.28** | -0.34** | -0.11 | 0.08 | 0.58** | -0.50** | 0.31** | 0.35** | 0.10 | 1.00 |
Table 8
Eigenvalue and eigenvector of selected principal component
性状Trait | 主成分 Principle factor | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | |
鲜荚产量FPY | 0.630 | 0.161 | 0.358 | 0.439 |
采青天数FPHD | 0.460 | 0.645 | -0.358 | -0.117 |
株高PH | 0.398 | 0.652 | 0.113 | -0.575 |
主茎节数NOMS | 0.375 | 0.601 | 0.098 | -0.639 |
单株有效分枝数EBPP | -0.080 | 0.448 | -0.604 | 0.481 |
单株有效鲜荚数EFPPP | -0.098 | 0.870 | 0.012 | 0.287 |
多粒荚率MSPR | 0.106 | 0.151 | 0.888 | 0.152 |
单株鲜荚重FPWPP | 0.686 | 0.561 | -0.120 | 0.278 |
百粒鲜重FSW | 0.803 | -0.426 | -0.220 | -0.071 |
500g标准荚数SPN | -0.878 | 0.386 | 0.008 | 0.007 |
标准二粒荚长SPL | 0.837 | -0.245 | -0.075 | 0.274 |
标准二粒荚宽SPW | 0.838 | -0.142 | -0.259 | 0.068 |
标准荚率 SPR | 0.349 | 0.094 | 0.778 | 0.165 |
A级口感率 GATQR | 0.478 | -0.401 | -0.021 | -0.367 |
特征值 Eigenvalue | 4.57 | 3.10 | 2.17 | 1.61 |
贡献率 Contribution rate / % | 32.68 | 22.16 | 15.53 | 11.48 |
累积贡献率Cumulative percentage /% | 32.68 | 54.83 | 70.37 | 81.84 |
1 |
盖钧镒, 王明军, 陈长之. 中国毛豆生产的历史渊源与发展[J]. 大豆科学, 2002, 21(1): 7-13. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-9841.2002.01.002 .
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-9841.2002.01.002 |
2 | 邢邯. 菜用大豆[M]. 南京: 江苏科学技术出版社, 2008. |
3 |
董友魁, 付连舜, 单维奎. 辽宁省鲜食大豆产业发展的可行性分析[J]. 大豆科技, 2014(3): 11-13. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1674-3547.2014.03.004 .
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-3547.2014.03.004 |
4 | 朱丹华. 依靠科技 强化服务 推进菜用大豆产业化[J]. 大豆通报, 2000(1): 3-3, 11. |
5 |
汪寿根, 陈润兴, 李建辉, 等. 衢州地区鲜食大豆秋延后种植高产高效栽培技术[J]. 农业科技通讯, 2015(7): 250-251. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-6400.2015.07.094 .
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6400.2015.07.094 |
6 |
石建尧. 提高浙江省鲜食大豆种植效益的栽培技术[J]. 浙江农业科学, 2004, 45(5): 289-290. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.0528-9017.2004.05.026 .
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0528-9017.2004.05.026 |
7 |
许开华, 热沙来提·买买提明, 姚尔群, 等. 大棚葡萄园早春间套种鲜食大豆技术[J]. 中国园艺文摘, 2015, 31(5): 201-201, 203. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1672-0873.2015.05.086 .
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-0873.2015.05.086 |
8 |
黄洪明, 吴美娟, 汪暖. 鲜食大豆主要间作套种模式及配套技术[J]. 农业科技通讯, 2015(11): 198-200. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-6400.2015.11.076 .
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6400.2015.11.076 |
9 |
戚自荣, 许开华, 崔萌萌, 等. 梨园间套种鲜食大豆技术[J]. 农业开发与装备, 2016(10): 181-182. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1673-9205.2016.10.156 .
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-9205.2016.10.156 |
10 |
王学军, 缪亚梅, 汪凯华, 等. 优质鲜食夏大豆新品种“通豆5号”选育研究[J]. 金陵科技学院学报, 2009, 25(1): 42-44. DOI:10.16515/j.cnki.32-1722/n.2009.01.008 .
doi: 10.16515/j.cnki.32-1722/n.2009.01.008 |
11 |
王学军, 缪亚梅, 汪凯华, 等. 优质鲜食夏大豆新品种 “通豆6号” 的选育[J]. 上海农业学报, 2010, 26(1): 105-107. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-3924.2010.01.026 .
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-3924.2010.01.026 |
12 |
陈新, 张红梅, 张智民, 等. 优质高产鲜食夏大豆苏豆6号的选育及栽培研究[J]. 金陵科技学院学报, 2008, 24(1): 37-39. DOI:10.16515/j.cnki.32-1722/n.2008.01.013 .
doi: 10.16515/j.cnki.32-1722/n.2008.01.013 |
13 |
袁星星, 陈新, 陈华涛, 等. 鲜食夏大豆新品种苏豆11号选育及配套栽培技术[J]. 作物研究, 2016, 30(2): 163-165. DOI:10.16848/j.cnki.issn.1001-5280.2016.02.14 .
doi: 10.16848/j.cnki.issn.1001-5280.2016.02.14 |
14 |
徐海风, 李曙光, 杨加银. 鲜食夏大豆新品种淮鲜豆9号的选育及栽培技术[J]. 大豆科学, 2020, 39(2): 327-328. DOI:10.11861/j.issn.1000-9841.2020.02.0327 .
doi: 10.11861/j.issn.1000-9841.2020.02.0327 |
15 |
杨加银, 徐海斌, 徐海风, 等. 鲜食夏大豆新品种淮豆10号的选育及栽培技术[J]. 种子, 2008, 27(10): 121-122. DOI:10.16590/j.cnki.1001-4705.2008.10.067 .
doi: 10.16590/j.cnki.1001-4705.2008.10.067 |
16 |
李凯, 盖钧镒, 孙长美, 等. 抗病优质高产大豆新品种南农413[J]. 大豆科学, 2020, 39(1): 162-164. DOI:10.11861/j.issn.1000-9841.2020.01.0162 .
doi: 10.11861/j.issn.1000-9841.2020.01.0162 |
17 | 武天龙, 赵则胜, 蒋家云, 等. 菜用大豆粒荚性状遗传变异及相关性的研究[J]. 上海农学院学报, 1999, 17(2): 79-84. |
18 | 陈长之. 长江中下游地区夏播菜用大豆品质性状的鉴定、相关及遗传变异研究[D]. 南京: 南京农业大学, 2002. |
19 | 韩立德, 邱家驯, 徐海明, 等. 夏播菜用大豆感官品质性状核心选样的构建[J]. 大豆科学, 2008, 27(1): 21-25. |
20 |
张辉明, 姜永平, 韩阳瑞. 江苏省鲜食大豆主要数量性状与产量的灰色关联度分析[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2009, 37(1): 187-189. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1002-1302.2009.01.076 .
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-1302.2009.01.076 |
21 |
王学军, 郝德荣, 顾国华, 等. 鲜食大豆主要农艺性状的遗传变异、相关性和主成分分析[J]. 金陵科技学院学报, 2008, 24(3): 61-64. DOI:10.16515/j.cnki.32-1722/n.2008.03.011 .
doi: 10.16515/j.cnki.32-1722/n.2008.03.011 |
22 |
韩天富. 中国菜用大豆的种植制度和品种类型[J]. 大豆科学, 2002, 21(2): 83-87. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-9841.2002.02.001 .
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-9841.2002.02.001 |
23 | 武天龙, 汤楠, 赵则胜, 等. 菜用大豆粒荚选择标准的研究[J]. 大豆科学, 2000, 19(2): 184-188. |
24 | 赵叶舟. 我国南方菜用大豆育成品种分析及展望[D]. 杭州: 浙江大学, 2015. |
25 |
缪亚梅, 王学军, 汪凯华, 等. 鲜食大豆农艺性状与鲜荚产量的灰色关联分析[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2008, 36(36): 15809-15810, 15813. DOI:10.13989/j.cnki.0517-6611.2008.36.072 .
doi: 10.13989/j.cnki.0517-6611.2008.36.072 |
26 |
赵朝森, 赵现伟, 杨中路, 等. 国家区试鲜食春大豆重要农艺性状的演变[J]. 大豆科学, 2019, 38(3): 337-343, 352. DOI:10.11861/j.issn.1000-9841.2019.03.0337 .
doi: 10.11861/j.issn.1000-9841.2019.03.0337 |
[1] | Jing-xiu YE, Hai-dong LIU, Xiao-rong XING, Jun LI, De-zhi DU. Relationship between chlorophyll content and yield and development of chlorophyll major QTL cqSPDA2 linkage marker in Brassica napus [J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF OIL CROP SCIENCES, 2022, 44(6): 1173-1181. |
[2] | Xi-guo HAN, Bo YANG, De-bin YU, Chang-hong XU, Fan-gang MENG, Qiang QIU, Jing ZHAO, Ming-hao ZHANG, Xiao-yan YAN, Wei ZHANG. Response of yield and related traits of soybean varieties with different iron efficiency to Fe-EDDHA fertilizer in calcareous iron-deficient soils [J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF OIL CROP SCIENCES, 2022, 44(6): 1329-1336. |
[3] | Shuang QUAN, Ya-shu CHEN, Meng-jia SUN, Chen CHENG, Hong-jian CHEN, Xiao-wen LI, Qian-chun DENG. Effect of preparation technology on stability and nutritional composition of flaxseed-hemp seed plant-based milk [J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF OIL CROP SCIENCES, 2022, 44(6): 1357-1367. |
[4] | Xiao-jun WANG, Chun-li WANG, Zhi ZHANG, Jian-li YANG, Ya-jun GAO. Optimal application rate of nitrogen fertilizer in winter rape planting area in southern Shaanxi Province [J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF OIL CROP SCIENCES, 2022, 44(5): 1065-1073. |
[5] | Peng-xiao CHEN, Ping-ping GUO, Fan YANG, Ye LIU, Jian-zhang WU, Wen-xue ZHU. Drying characteristics and quality of wet peeling Cyperus esculentus under different drying processes [J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF OIL CROP SCIENCES, 2022, 44(5): 1117-1122. |
[6] | Yang LIAO, Chang-zhu LI, Ye-shi YIN, Rong-ling YAN, Si-si LIU. Research progress of a new woody oil tree species Swida wilsoniana [J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF OIL CROP SCIENCES, 2022, 44(5): 948-956. |
[7] | Cheng CUI, Hao-jie LI, Jin-fang ZHANG, Ben-chuan ZHENG, Liang CHAI, Jun JIANG, Ka ZHANG, Hai-yan QIN, Zai-yun LI, Liang-cai JIANG. Preliminary study on Songyou 2 for oilseeds and cruciferous vegetable [J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF OIL CROP SCIENCES, 2022, 44(5): 973-980. |
[8] | Yao XU, Su-feng LENG, Yu-ming ZHANG, Jin-hua SONG, Ke ZHAO. Evolution analysis of main agronomic traits, yield, quality and resistance of soybean varieties released in Jiangsu Province from 1982 to 2021 [J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF OIL CROP SCIENCES, 2022, 44(4): 780-789. |
[9] | Yue ZHANG, Jia-qi WANG, Zi-jian YU, Qiang XU, Lan ZHANG, Yu-xin PAN. Bioinformatics analysis of MIKC-type MADS-box gene family in legumes [J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF OIL CROP SCIENCES, 2022, 44(4): 798-809. |
[10] | Rui YAO, Kai-neng ZHAO, Chang XIE, Hai-ling SONG, Shuang XU, Hai-qiu YU, Zheng ZHANG, Jing WANG, Chun-ji JIANG, Shu-li ZHAO, Xiao-guang WANG. Effects of postponing nitrogen application on nitrogen enzyme activities, nitrogen utilization efficiency and yield in peanut [J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF OIL CROP SCIENCES, 2022, 44(4): 877-883. |
[11] | Hui-min SHI, Fei-yan SU, Jian-hua HOU. Advances in genome-wide association analysis of quality related traits in oil crops [J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF OIL CROP SCIENCES, 2022, 44(3): 483-490. |
[12] | Qing-nan HAO, Fang YANG, Ai-ai WANG, Ze-fu LONG, Zhong-lu YANG, Hai-feng CHEN, Zhi-hui SHAN, Jun-bo DENG, Xin-an ZHOU. Effects of nitrogen fertilizer and sodium nitratol on photosynthetic characteristics and yield quality in southern soybean [J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF OIL CROP SCIENCES, 2022, 44(3): 610-620. |
[13] | Kai LU, Jun-shan QI, Kai QI, Li-guo MA, Yue-li ZHANG, Bo ZHANG, Guo-ping MA, Chang-song LI. Pathogen identification of Pythium root rot disease on soybean [J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF OIL CROP SCIENCES, 2022, 44(3): 652-658. |
[14] | Wei-jun WANG, Chang ZHENG, Bo YANG, Qi ZHOU, Chang-sheng LIU, Huang-xiang LI. Effects of popping pretreatment on the quality and volatile flavor components of three types of rapeseed oil [J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF OIL CROP SCIENCES, 2022, 44(3): 659-666. |
[15] | Yu-ning YANG, Hong-chang LIU, Er-gang GAO, Yuan-yuan LI, Song-shu CHEN, Xue-hui XIN. Basic quality evaluation of 21 germplasm oils of Akebia [J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF OIL CROP SCIENCES, 2022, 44(2): 365-375. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||