CHINESE JOURNAL OF OIL CROP SCIENCES ›› 2023, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (1): 72-82.doi: 10.19802/j.issn.1007-9084.2021317
Previous Articles Next Articles
Ming-chuan ZHU1(), Jun-yan WU1, Li MA1, Shi-qian GUO2, Xiao-ru CUI3, Xiu-cun ZENG4, Li-jun LIU1, Yuan-yuan PU1, Xue-cai LI1(
), Wan-cang SUN1(
)
Received:
2021-12-17
Online:
2023-02-25
Published:
2023-03-03
Contact:
Xue-cai LI,Wan-cang SUN
E-mail:2676754803@qq.com;348930135@qq.com;18293121851@163.com;348930135@qq.com
CLC Number:
Ming-chuan ZHU, Jun-yan WU, Li MA, Shi-qian GUO, Xiao-ru CUI, Xiu-cun ZENG, Li-jun LIU, Yuan-yuan PU, Xue-cai LI, Wan-cang SUN. Grey correlation analysis of nutrient accumulation characteristics and yield traits of winter rapeseed in North China[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF OIL CROP SCIENCES, 2023, 45(1): 72-82.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: http://www.jouroilcrops.cn/EN/10.19802/j.issn.1007-9084.2021317
Table 1
Comparison of the yield traits of different winter type B. rapa and B. napus varieties
类型 Type | 品种 Varieties | 产量性状 Yield traits | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
株高 Plant height /cm | 分枝高度 Branch height /cm | 一次分枝数 Number of primary branches | 二次分枝数 Number of secondary branches | 主花序长度 Branch height /cm | 主花序角果数 Siliques on main inflorescence | 单株角果数 Siliques per plant | 角粒数 Seeds per silique | 千粒重 1000 seed weight /g | 单株产量 Plant yield /g | 小区产量 Plot yield /kg | ||
B. rapa | 16QD15 | 115.50±0.50de | 8.95±0.15cd | 12.50±1.50ab | 9.00±0.00a | 41.50±1.50bcd | 35.00±1.00cd | 167.00±3.00cd | 18.50±1.50cde | 2.34±0.18d | 4.55±0.22d | 2.56±0.22e |
冬油8号 | 112.50±0.50e | 31.50±3.50b | 8.00±1.00cd | 3.50±0.50bc | 43.00±4.00abc | 38.50±0.50c | 135.50±23.50d | 22.50±0.50ab | 2.62±0.10cd | 9.52±0.54b | 2.98±0.24de | |
H614 | 126.50±0.50bc | 27.00±2.00b | 8.00±0.00cd | 4.50±0.50b | 48.00±5.00ab | 29.50±0.50d | 170.00±11.00cd | 19.00±1.00bcde | 2.50±0.02cd | 6.69±1.31bcd | 4.57±0.26c | |
16RTS309 | 121.50±3.50cd | 15.75±1.25c | 8.00±0.00cd | 1.00±1.00ef | 32.50±1.50cd | 20.00±3.00e | 134.50±9.50d | 13.50±0.50f | 2.92±0.00c | 6.22±0.50cd | 3.12±0.29de | |
2019HNL7-3 | 119.00±4.00cde | 10.00±3.00cd | 11.50±0.50abc | 3.00±0.00cd | 52.50±0.50a | 40.50±1.50c | 160.00±3.00cd | 17.50±0.50de | 2.66±0.02cd | 5.33±0.45d | 2.18±0.11e | |
2019HN12PZ16-239 | 116.00±1.00de | 4.50±0.50d | 6.50±0.50d | 3.50±0.50bc | 47.50±0.50ab | 37.50±0.50c | 229.50±32.50bc | 23.50±0.50a | 2.84±0.00c | 6.51±0.60cd | 3.21±0.63de | |
均值±标准误 Mean±SE | 118.50±1.67 | 16.28±1.73 | 9.08±0.58 | 4.08±0.42 | 44.17±2.17 | 33.50±1.17 | 166.08±13.75 | 19.08±0.75 | 2.67±0.05 | 6.47±0.60 | 3.10±0.04de | |
变异系数 CV /% | 4.47 | 64.46 | 26.33 | 63.91 | 16.32 | 10.12 | 22.80 | 22.17 | 8.40 | 27.36 | 29.41 | |
B. napus | 2019GL-QAU-22 | 131.00±1.00ab | 54.25±0.75a | 9.50±0.50bcd | 0.00±0.00f | 37.00±7.00bcd | 46.50±0.50b | 198.00±6.00cd | 19.50±0.50bcde | 4.60±0.04ab | 15.57±0.94a | 4.05±0.07cd |
2019GL-QAU-39 | 135.00±4.00a | 26.50±1.50b | 12.50±2.50ab | 2.50±0.50cd | 32.50±0.50cd | 54.5±0.50a | 338.50±50.50a | 16.50±0.50ef | 4.32±0.04b | 14.32±1.46a | 6.87±0.7ab | |
2019GL-QAU-199 | 133.50±0.50ab | 35.50±1.50b | 11.00±1.00abc | 0.50±0.50f | 31.50±0.50d | 46.50±2.50b | 229.50±24.50bc | 21.50±1.50abc | 4.68±0.24ab | 15.01±0.77a | 7.47±0.45ab | |
2019低1-6 | 135.50±2.50a | 29.5±7.50b | 11.00±1.00abc | 0.00±0.00f | 34.50±2.50cd | 57.00±3.00a | 238.50±2.50bc | 22.00±1.00abc | 4.98±0.22a | 8.45±0.15bc | 8.07±0.07a | |
2019低2-13 | 132.50±1.50ab | 30.00±7.00b | 11.00±2.00abc | 0.00±0.00f | 39.00±5.00bcd | 52.50±2.50a | 305.50±44.50ab | 21.00±0.00abcd | 4.36±0.08b | 8.85±1.51b | 7.20±0.37ab | |
2019QL-GAU-196 | 131.75±3.25ab | 27.5±0.50b | 14.50±0.50a | 2.00±0.00de | 35.00±1.00cd | 57.00±2.00a | 353.50±8.50a | 20.50±2.50abcd | 4.43±0.19b | 16.82±0.14a | 4.25±0.73cd | |
均值±标准误 Mean±SE | 133.21±2.13 | 33.88±3.13 | 11.58±1.25 | 0.83±0.17 | 34.92±2.75 | 52.33±1.83 | 277.20±22.75 | 20.17±1.00 | 4.56±0.14 | 13.17±0.83 | 6.32±0.340b | |
变异系数 CV /% | 3.72 | 32.28 | 19.29 | 40.80 | 13.40 | 9.81 | 16.65 | 9.72 | 6.33 | 27.22 | 26.19 |
Table 2
Comparison of organs dry matter accumulation of different winter type B. rapa and B. napus varieties
类型 Type | 品种 Varieties | 器官 Organs | 干物质产量g/株 Dry matter yield g /plant | 收获指数 /% Harvest index | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
根 Root | 茎 Stem | 叶 Leaf | 花 Flower | 籽粒 Seed | 果壳 Silique shell | ||||
B. rapa | 16QD15 | 3.010±0.470bcd | 9.300±1.240e | 6.176±0.116cd | 0.698±0.013e | 5.330±0.450d | 5.025±0.735f | 29.540±0.400d | 0.255±0.025bc |
冬油8号 Dongyou 8 | 1.725±0.225d | 9.300±1.310e | 5.192±0.367d | 0.587±0.04e | 6.215±0.495cd | 6.560±1.500ef | 29.580±3.490d | 0.290±0.020abc | |
H614 | 1.800±0.150d | 12.380±1.910de | 5.192±0.869d | 0.587±0.098e | 9.515±0.535b | 12.225±1.95d | 41.700±2.520d | 0.315±0.005ab | |
16RTS309 | 3.245±0.125bcd | 13.525±0.995cde | 8.859±1.255bc | 1.00±0.142de | 6.510±0.600cd | 8.470±0.000e | 42.610±0.070d | 0.205±0.025cd | |
2019HNL7-3 | 1.900±0.690cd | 15.230±0.850bcde | 6.446±0.116cd | 0.729±0.013e | 4.550±0.220d | 8.545±0.095e | 37.400±1.790d | 0.145±0.005d | |
2019HN12PZ16-239 | 1.715±0.065d | 8.880±0.250e | 6.562±0.425cd | 0.742±0.48e | 6.685±1.305bcd | 7.555±0.745ef | 32.140±1.390d | 0.285±0.055abc | |
均值±标准误 Mean±SE | 2.233±0.261 | 11.436±0.990 | 6.404±0.501 | 0.724±0.057 | 6.468±0.632 | 8.063±0.905 | 35.328±1.610 | 0.249±0.026 | |
B. napus | 2019GL-QAU-22 | 4.175±0.995ab | 16.805±3.565abcd | 9.206±0.097bc | 1.685±0.010bc | 8.445±0.145bc | 15.775±0.905bc | 56.092±5.717c | 0.195±0.015cd |
2019GL-QAU-39 | 5.410±1.050a | 19.865±4.465abc | 13.066±1.949a | 2.399±0.358a | 14.315±1.455a | 25.930±1.790a | 80.985±11.067ab | 0.235±0.005ab | |
2019GL-QAU-199 | 4.505±0.325ab | 21.140±1.340ab | 7.643±0.232cd | 1.404±0.043cd | 15.565±0.935a | 18.155±0.225b | 68.411±1.451bc | 0.325±0.015ab | |
2019低1-6 2019 Di 1-6 | 4.610±0.190ab | 23.085±1.735a | 13.645±0.328a | 2.505±0.060a | 16.820±0.140a | 22.960±0.140a | 83.626±1.8175a | 0.270±0.000abc | |
2019低2-13 2019 Di 2-13 | 3.565±0.405bc | 15.850±3.030abcde | 8.858±0.946bc | 1.627±0.174c | 15.005±0.765a | 15.790±1.06bc | 60.695±4.849c | 0.365±0.065a | |
2019QL-GAU-196 | 3.910±0.190ab | 15.060±0.960bcde | 11.792±1.718ab | 2.165±0.315ab | 8.850±1.520bc | 14.570±1.190cd | 56.347±3.973c | 0.205±0.025cd | |
均值±标准误 Mean±SE | 4.363±0.239 | 18.634±1.196 | 10.702±0.919 | 1.964±0.169 | 13.167±1.341 | 18.863±1.705 | 67.693±4.812 | 0.2658±0.028 |
Fig. 1
Heatmap of nutrient content and accumulation amount in different winter type rapeseed organsNote: 1 to 12: 12 winter rapeseed varieties; a-f represent different organs, sequentially, stems, leaves, flowers, seeds, silique shell. (A) Heatmap of nitrogen content in different winter type rapeseed organs; (B) Heatmap of phosphorus content in different winter type rapeseed organs; (C) Heatmap of potassium content in different winter type rapeseed organs; (D) Heatmap of nitrogen accumulation in different winter type rapeseed organs; (E) Heatmap of phosphorus accumulation in different winter type rapeseed organs; (F) Heatmap of potassium accumulation in different winter type rapeseed organs
Table 3
Comparison of nutrient content and accumulation in different winter type rapeseed organs
类型 Type | 器官 Organs | 养分含量 Nutrient content /% | 养分积累量 Nutrient accumulation /(g/plant) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
N | P | K | N | P | K | ||
B. rapa | 根Root | 0.868±0.061g | 0.167±0.057e | 5.267±0.437a | 0.020±0.003i | 0.005±0.000ghi | 0.118±0.025cd |
茎Stem | 0.450±0.027i | 0.029±0.008j | 2.178±0.146i | 0.050±0.004fghi | 0.003±0.001ij | 0.253±0.048cd | |
叶Leaf | 1.807±0.229d | 0.088±0.010gh | 3.233±0.138de | 0.120±0.027fg | 0.006±0.001fg | 0.198±0.034cd | |
花Flower | 3.380±0.140a | 0.531±0.022a | 4.722±0.485b | 0.024±0.002hi | 0.004±0.000hi | 0.035±0.005d | |
籽粒Seed | 3.204±0.104b | 0.300±0.016b | 0.889±0.084i | 0.206±0.019de | 0.018±0.001d | 0.055±0.017cd | |
果壳Silique shell | 0.779±0.065g | 0.074±0.010hi | 1.672±0.345h | 0.062±0.009fghi | 0.006±0.001fg | 0.136±0.030cd | |
合计Total | 1.361±0.001e | 0.119±0.001f | 2.262±0.084i | 0.482±0.005b | 0.042±0.001b | 0.795±0.024b | |
B. napus | 根Root | 0.615±0.056h | 0.043±0.037j | 3.078±0.291de | 0.027±0.003hi | 0.002±0.002bi | 0.132±0.014cd |
茎Stem | 0.603±0.077h | 0.027±0.011j | 3.996±0.150c | 0.112±0.013fgh | 0.005±0.002gh | 0.748±0.060b | |
叶Leaf | 1.272±0.197ef | 0.063±0.008i | 2.978±0.149f | 0.131±0.018ef | 0.007±0.001f | 0.316±0.024c | |
花Flower | 1.902±0.173d | 0.217±0.017d | 2.594±0.183fg | 0.038±0.006ghi | 0.004±0.001ghi | 0.051±0.006cd | |
籽粒Seed | 2.764±0.110c | 0.236±0.004c | 1.178±0.094h | 0.360±0.029c | 0.031±0.002c | 0.157±0.026cd | |
果壳Silique shell | 1.180±0.146ef | 0.070±0.011i | 3.506±0.187d | 0.222±0.032d | 0.014±0.003e | 0.652±0.058b | |
合计Total | 1.328±0.041e | 0.092±0.002g | 3.050±0.004def | 0.890±0.061a | 0.063±0.001a | 2.056±0.1289a |
Table 4
Comparison of total amount of nitrogen phosphorus and potassium in unit area and nutrient demand per 100 kg grain
类型 Type | 器官 Organs | 干物质积累量 /(kg/hm2) Dry matter accumulation | 单位面积氮磷钾总积累量 /(kg/hm2) Total amount of nitrogen phosphorus and potassium in unit area | 每100 kg籽粒养分需求量 /kg Nutrient requirement per 100 kg grain | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
N | P | K | N | P | K | |||
B. rapa | 根Root | 837.195 | 7.260 | 1.395 | 44.085 | 7.143 | 0.572 | 10.467 |
茎Stem | 4288.500 | 19.275 | 1.245 | 93.390 | ||||
叶Leaf | 2401.695 | 43.380 | 2.115 | 77.655 | ||||
花Flower | 271.500 | 9.180 | 1.440 | 12.825 | ||||
果壳Silique shell | 3023.625 | 23.535 | 2.250 | 50.565 | ||||
合计(除籽粒) Total (except grains) | 10822.515 | 102.630 | 8.460 | 278.190 | ||||
籽粒Seed | 2425.320 | 77.715 | 7.290 | 21.555 | ||||
合计Total | 13247.835 | 180.360 | 15.735 | 299.760 | ||||
养分还田量 Nutrient returning amount | 57.090 | 4.710 | 278.190 | |||||
B. napus | 根Root | 1635.945 | 10.065 | 0.705 | 50.355 | 6.554 | 0.463 | 14.612 |
茎Stem | 6987.750 | 42.120 | 1.875 | 279.255 | ||||
叶Leaf | 4013.250 | 51.045 | 2.550 | 119.505 | ||||
花Flower | 736.500 | 14.010 | 1.605 | 19.110 | ||||
果壳Silique shell | 7073.820 | 83.460 | 4.935 | 192.660 | ||||
合计(除籽粒) Total (except grains) | 20447.250 | 200.730 | 11.655 | 716.250 | ||||
籽粒Seed | 4937.445 | 136.485 | 11.655 | 58.155 | ||||
合计Total | 25384.680 | 337.215 | 23.295 | 774.405 | ||||
养分还田量 Nutrient returning amount | 111.645 | 6.480 | 716.250 |
Table 5
Grey correlation degree between nutrient, dry matter accumulation and yield traits in two winter type rapeseeds
类型 Type | 指标 Index | 产量性状Yield traits | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
X1 | X2 | X3 | X4 | X5 | X6 | X7 | X8 | X9 | X10 | ||
B. rapa | N | 0.904 | 0.725 | 0.844 | 0.810 | 0.913 | 0.896 | 0.921 | 0.883 | 0.901 | 0.901 |
P | 0.913 | 0.714 | 0.853 | 0.793 | 0.934 | 0.919 | 0.919 | 0.897 | 0.923 | 0.889 | |
K | 0.844 | 0.684 | 0.821 | 0.837 | 0.858 | 0.820 | 0.878 | 0.851 | 0.826 | 0.810 | |
干物质 Dry matter | 0.904 | 0.714 | 0.862 | 0.805 | 0.905 | 0.913 | 0.922 | 0.886 | 0.911 | 0.892 | |
单株产量 Plant yield | 0.881 | 0.765 | 0.819 | 0.781 | 0.865 | 0.841 | 0.842 | 0.876 | 0.888 | - | |
B. napus | N | 0.740 | 0.533 | 0.767 | 0.470 | 0.756 | 0.804 | 0.726 | 0.791 | 0.726 | 0.773 |
P | 0.682 | 0.597 | 0.689 | 0.534 | 0.692 | 0.714 | 0.714 | 0.782 | 0.668 | 0.703 | |
K | 0.742 | 0.586 | 0.732 | 0.468 | 0.698 | 0.708 | 0.723 | 0.831 | 0.739 | 0.745 | |
干物质 Dry matter | 0.756 | 0.507 | 0.722 | 0.445 | 0.684 | 0.731 | 0.790 | 0.781 | 0.713 | 0.663 | |
单株产量 Plant yield | 0.671 | 0.653 | 0.707 | 0.565 | 0.654 | 0.651 | 0.649 | 0.789 | 0.677 | - |
1 |
孙万仓, 马卫国, 雷建民, 等. 冬油菜在西北旱寒区的适应性和北移的可行性研究[J]. 中国农业科学, 2007, 40(12): 2716-2726. DOI:10.3321/j.issn: 0578-1752.2007.12.008 .
doi: 10.3321/j.issn: 0578-1752.2007.12.008 |
2 |
戴敬, 徐俊兵, 喻义珠, 等. 冬油菜春后干物质积累与产量的关系[J]. 扬州大学学报, 2005, 26(1): 77-80. DOI:10.16872/j.cnki.1671-4652.2005.01.021 .
doi: 10.16872/j.cnki.1671-4652.2005.01.021 |
3 | 左青松, 刘荣, 石剑飞, 等. 油菜不同氮素籽粒生产效率类型品种干物质生产及农艺性状差异[J]. 中国油料作物学报, 2010, 32(2): 235-239. |
4 |
柯媛媛, 陈翔, 倪芊芊, 等. 小麦干物质积累与分配规律研究进展[J]. 大麦与谷类科学, 2021, 38(3): 1-7, 12. DOI:10.14069/j.cnki.32-1769/s.2021.03.001 .
doi: 10.14069/j.cnki.32-1769/s.2021.03.001 |
5 |
胡启星, 刘帅, 白志刚, 等. 种植密度对中棉425干物质积累与分配的影响[J]. 棉花科学, 2021, 43(2): 29-35. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.2095-3143.2021.02.004 .
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-3143.2021.02.004 |
6 |
田树云, 文仁来, 何雪银, 等. 玉米杂交种桂单0811干物质积累与养分吸收、分配规律[J]. 耕作与栽培, 2021, 41(1): 32-37. DOI:10.13605/j.cnki.52-1065/s.2021.01.008 .
doi: 10.13605/j.cnki.52-1065/s.2021.01.008 |
7 |
张金铭, 杨衍, 戚志强, 等. 苦瓜干物质分配和养分吸收规律研究[J]. 北方园艺, 2021(1): 7-14. DOI:10.11937/bfyy.20201997 .
doi: 10.11937/bfyy.20201997 |
8 | 司贤宗, 张翔, 索炎炎, 等. 潮土区不同品种花生的干物质积累与氮磷钾养分需求的差异分析[J]. 农学学报, 2020, 10(6): 40-45. |
9 |
李月梅. 甘蓝型春油菜品种干物质积累和养分吸收分配特性研究[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2019, 47(16): 78-82. DOI:10.15889/j.issn.1002-1302.2019.16.016 .
doi: 10.15889/j.issn.1002-1302.2019.16.016 |
10 |
冷锁虎, 单玉华, 周宝梅. 氮素营养对油菜成熟期生物产量的调控[J]. 中国油料作物学报, 2000, 22(2): 53. DOI:10.3321/j.issn: 1007-9084.2000.02.015 .
doi: 10.3321/j.issn: 1007-9084.2000.02.015 |
11 |
许显虹, 胥婷婷, 张洋, 等. 青海甘蓝型春油菜不同品种之间磷效率的差异[J]. 分子植物育种, 2021, 19(24): 8272-8278. DOI:10.13271/j.mpb.019.008272 .
doi: 10.13271/j.mpb.019.008272 |
12 | 刘晓伟, 鲁剑巍, 李小坤, 等. 不同钾效率类型油菜的农艺性状及钾素积累特征比较[J]. 中国油料作物学报, 2012, 34(4): 402-406. |
13 | 曹金华, 王建平, 朱家成, 等. 双低杂交油菜‘丰油10号’干物质积累及养分吸收规律[J]. 中国农学通报, 2017, 33(34): 32-39. |
14 | 鲍士旦. 土壤农化分析[M]. 3版. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2000. |
15 | 唐启义. DPS数据处理系统: 实验设计、统计分析及数据挖掘[M]. 2版. 北京: 科学出版社, 2010. |
16 | Fisher R A A. The distribution of the partial correlation coefficient[J]. Metron, 1924, 3: 329-332. |
17 |
袁婺洲, 官春云. 作物收获指数的研究概况[J]. 作物研究, 1994, 8(4): 45-48. DOI:10.16848/j.cnki.issn.1001-5280.1994.04.017
doi: 10.16848/j.cnki.issn.1001-5280.1994.04.017 |
18 |
Liu X J, Wang J C, Lu S H, et al. Effects of non-flooded mulching cultivation on crop yield, nutrient uptake and nutrient balance in rice-wheat cropping systems[J]. Field Crops Res, 2003, 83(3): 297-311. DOI:10.1016/S0378-4290(03)00079-0 .
doi: 10.1016/S0378-4290(03)00079-0 |
19 | 邓聚龙. 农业系统灰色理论与方法[M]. 济南: 山东科学技术出版社, 1988: 39-74. |
20 | 严红梅, 汤维群, 李虹桥, 等. 施氮量对半矮秆油菜产量、干物质积累及氮素吸收利用的影响[J]. 华北农学报, 2020, 35(S1): 250-255. |
21 |
邹娟, 鲁剑巍, 刘锐林, 等. 4个双低甘蓝型油菜品种干物质积累及养分吸收动态[J]. 华中农业大学学报, 2008, 27(2): 229-234. DOI:10.13300/j.cnki.hnlkxb.2008.02.022 .
doi: 10.13300/j.cnki.hnlkxb.2008.02.022 |
22 | 张颖. 不同产量类型春玉米养分吸收特点及其分配规律的研究[J]. 玉米科学, 1997, 5(3): 70-72. |
23 |
王森, 莫菁华, 汪洋, 等. 水稻-再生稻体系干物质积累及氮磷钾养分的吸收利用[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2018, 32(1): 67-77. DOI:10.16819/j.1001-7216.2018.7027 .
doi: 10.16819/j.1001-7216.2018.7027 |
24 |
刘冬碧, 陈防, 鲁剑巍, 等. 油菜干物质积累和养分钾、磷、硫吸收特点及施钾的影响[J]. 中国油料作物学报, 2001, 23(2): 48-51, 56. DOI:10.3321/j.issn: 1007-9084.2001.02.012 .
doi: 10.3321/j.issn: 1007-9084.2001.02.012 |
25 |
周宝元, 孙雪芳, 丁在松, 等. 土壤耕作和施肥方式对夏玉米干物质积累与产量的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2017, 50(11): 2129-2140. DOI:10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2017.11.018 .
doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2017.11.018 |
26 |
张运红, 孙克刚, 杜君, 等. 施氮水平对不同基因型优质小麦干物质积累、产量及氮素吸收利用的影响[J]. 河南农业科学, 2017, 46(4): 10-16. DOI:10.15933/j.cnki.1004-3268.2017.04.003 .
doi: 10.15933/j.cnki.1004-3268.2017.04.003 |
27 |
唐金花, 宋海星, 官春云, 等. 不同氮磷钾配比对湘杂油753生长和养分吸收的影响[J]. 湖南农业科学, 2012(13): 65-67. DOI:10.16498/j.cnki.hnnykx.2012.13.032 .
doi: 10.16498/j.cnki.hnnykx.2012.13.032 |
28 | 白雪. 氮磷钾配施及施硼对旱作双低春油菜生理基础及产质量的影响[D]. 呼和浩特: 内蒙古农业大学, 2018. |
29 |
胡宇倩, 周旋, 资涛, 等. 早熟冬油菜品种各器官干物质及养分积累特征[J]. 中国油料作物学报, 2021, 43(4): 690-699. DOI:10.19802/j.issn.1007-9084.2020003 .
doi: 10.19802/j.issn.1007-9084.2020003 |
30 | 刘晓伟. 冬油菜养分吸收规律及不同养分效率品种特征比较研究[D]. 武汉: 华中农业大学, 2011. |
31 |
李逢雨, 孙锡发, 冯文强, 等. 麦秆、油菜秆还田腐解速率及养分释放规律研究[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2009, 15(2): 374-380. DOI:10.3321/j.issn: 1008-505X.2009.02.018 .
doi: 10.3321/j.issn: 1008-505X.2009.02.018 |
32 |
常凤, 李岚涛, 陶静静, 等. 施氮与耕作方式对冬小麦产量和氮肥效率的影响[J]. 河南农业大学学报, 2021, 55(2): 214-220. DOI:10.16445/j.cnki.1000-2340.20210311.002 .
doi: 10.16445/j.cnki.1000-2340.20210311.002 |
33 |
黄乙琼, 刘蓉, 赵长坤, 等. 油菜秸秆还田对土壤养分供应的影响[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2020, 59(20): 51-55, 87. DOI:10.14088/j.cnki.issn0439-8114.2020.20.011 .
doi: 10.14088/j.cnki.issn0439-8114.2020.20.011 |
34 |
高珍珍, 王蓉, 龚松玲, 等. 不同类型秸秆还田对稻田土壤氨氧化微生物群落结构的影响[J]. 生态科学, 2020, 39(4): 66-73. DOI:10.14108/j.cnki.1008-8873.2020.04.009 .
doi: 10.14108/j.cnki.1008-8873.2020.04.009 |
[1] | Ya-ping CHEN, Xiao-tian ZHU, Yue HONG, Mao-run ZHOU, Chao ZHENG, Cui-ying WEI, Mei-song ZHOU, Yan YU, Fu-gui ZHANG, Yan-hua KAN, Ke-jin ZHOU. Effects of foliar spraying potassium-containing organic water-soluble fertilizer on rapeseed growth and yield [J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF OIL CROP SCIENCES, 2023, 45(1): 131-137. |
[2] | Bi-yun CHEN, Pei-jun LYU, Kun XU, Xiao-ming WU. Chloroplast DNA polymorphism of Brassica napus using SSR markers [J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF OIL CROP SCIENCES, 2023, 45(1): 46-55. |
[3] | Zu-qing MENG, Feng-ping SONG, Jia-hui HUO, Mo-feng ZHANG, Fu-chao YANG, Wei-lie ZHENG, Cui-hua LIU. Comparative analysis on light-temperature resource use efficiency of spring rapeseed(Brassica napus) differing in maturity in China Tibet under plateau climate [J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF OIL CROP SCIENCES, 2023, 45(1): 63-71. |
[4] | Yan-lin YAO, Li MA, Li-jun LIU, Xue-cai LI, Peng LI, Wang-tian WANG, Yuan-yuan PU, Zao-xia NIU, Fang XU, Wan-cang SUN, Jun-yan WU. Genome-wide identification, cloning and analysis of BrFLC family in northern winter rapeseed (Brassica rapa) [J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF OIL CROP SCIENCES, 2023, 45(1): 83-94. |
[5] | Jing-xiu YE, Hai-dong LIU, Xiao-rong XING, Jun LI, De-zhi DU. Relationship between chlorophyll content and yield and development of chlorophyll major QTL cqSPDA2 linkage marker in Brassica napus [J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF OIL CROP SCIENCES, 2022, 44(6): 1173-1181. |
[6] | Mei XIONG, Guang-sheng YANG, Deng-feng HONG, Zhao-yang WANG. Genetic improvement and application of resistance to clubroot in male parent of Brassica napus hybrid Shengguang 168 [J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF OIL CROP SCIENCES, 2022, 44(6): 1182-1189. |
[7] | Yan-cheng WEN, Jun-ping HE, Dong-fang CAI, Shu-fen ZHANG, Jia-cheng ZHU, Jian-ping WANG, Jin-hua CAO, Kun HU, Lei ZHAO, Dong-guo WANG, Yi-zi LIU. Genetic rule of cuticular wax in Brassica napus L. and their roles in stress resistance [J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF OIL CROP SCIENCES, 2022, 44(6): 1190-1198. |
[8] | Cheng CUI, Hao-jie LI, Jin-fang ZHANG, Ben-chuan ZHENG, Liang CHAI, Jun JIANG, Ka ZHANG, Hai-yan QIN, Zai-yun LI, Liang-cai JIANG. Preliminary study on Songyou 2 for oilseeds and cruciferous vegetable [J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF OIL CROP SCIENCES, 2022, 44(5): 973-980. |
[9] | Xue-cai LI, Jiao-jiao JIN, Li MA, Jun-yan WU, Qi-xian CHEN, Rui ZENG, Xiu-cun ZENG, Xiao-ru CUI, Wan-cang SUN. Relationship between height of growth point and cold resistance in strong winter rape (Brassica napus L.) in Northern China [J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF OIL CROP SCIENCES, 2022, 44(4): 739-750. |
[10] | Rong ZUO, Shan WU, Jie LIU, Ming HU, Xiao-hui CHENG, Yue-ying LIU, Ze-tao BAI, Sheng-yi LIU. Genome-wide characterization of F-box-LRR genes and their transcript response to Sclerotinia sclerotiorum induction in Brassica napus [J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF OIL CROP SCIENCES, 2022, 44(3): 503-514. |
[11] | Yu-qian WANG, Cheng-sheng CHAO, Jing DAI, Xin-jie SHEN, Yin-shui LI, Chi-ming GU, Li-hua XIE, Xiao-jia HU, Lu QIN, Xing LIAO. Difference in carbon and nitrogen metabolism of rapeseed (Brassica napus L.) with contrasting nitrogen efficiency at seedling stage [J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF OIL CROP SCIENCES, 2022, 44(3): 589-601. |
[12] | Liang XU, Jian-rong LIN, De-zhi DU. Identification and screening of elite germplasm for spring rapeseed area by genotyping and phenotyping [J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF OIL CROP SCIENCES, 2022, 44(2): 280-288. |
[13] | Yu-qin ZHANG, Zhi-fan YANG, Yue LI, Yin-shui LI, Xiao-jia HU, Lu QIN, Xing LIAO. Effect of exogenous trehalose on seed germination and seedling growth of rapeseed under low temperature [J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF OIL CROP SCIENCES, 2022, 44(2): 376-384. |
[14] | Fang WANG, Rui-mao ZHANG, Sha HUANG, Rong TANG, Lu-lu WANG, Bin YANG, Zhuan-zhuan WANG, Yuan-yu YANG, Min WANG, De-gang ZHAO, Chao LI. Creation of Brassica napus dwarf material LSW2018 [J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF OIL CROP SCIENCES, 2022, 44(1): 1-6. |
[15] | Jing LUO, Chao LI, Rui-mao ZHANG, De-gang ZHAO, Zhi-hong GAO, Fang WANG, Yuan-yu YANG, Zhuan-zhuan WANG, Min WANG. Transcriptome sequencing analysis of dwarfing traits in Brassica napus line DW871 [J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF OIL CROP SCIENCES, 2022, 44(1): 14-24. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||