CHINESE JOURNAL OF OIL CROP SCIENCES ›› 2023, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (1): 148-154.doi: 10.19802/j.issn.1007-9084.2022014
Previous Articles Next Articles
Yan-yan SUO1(), Xiang ZHANG1(
), Xian-zong SI1, Liang LI1, Pei-jun CHENG1, Hui YU2, Juan LIU3
Received:
2022-01-17
Online:
2023-02-25
Published:
2023-03-03
Contact:
Xiang ZHANG
E-mail:suoyanyan2006@163.com;zxtf203@163.com
CLC Number:
Yan-yan SUO, Xiang ZHANG, Xian-zong SI, Liang LI, Pei-jun CHENG, Hui YU, Juan LIU. Effects of lime and biochar applicationon nitrogen uptake and yield of peanut in acid soil[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF OIL CROP SCIENCES, 2023, 45(1): 148-154.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: http://www.jouroilcrops.cn/EN/10.19802/j.issn.1007-9084.2022014
Table 2
Effect of lime and biochar application on soil chemical characteristics
处理 Treatment | pH | 有机质 Organic matter /(g/kg) | 碱解氮 Alkaline nitrogen /(mg/kg) | 交换性钙 Exchangeable Ca /Cmol/kg) | 交换性铝 Exchangeable Al /(cmol/kg) | 碳/氮 Carbon/Nitrogen |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CK | 4.69 c | 16.9 d | 132.3 d | 6.35 c | 3.35 a | 74.10 c |
B | 4.92 b | 28.7 a | 142.0 bc | 7.63 b | 2.84 b | 117.23 a |
L | 5.22 a | 16.0 d | 139.0 c | 9.30 a | 2.06 c | 66.77 c |
B1L1 | 5.18 a | 20.5 c | 154.7 a | 8.60 ab | 2.11 c | 76.86 c |
B2L2 | 4.98 b | 23.5 b | 145.3 b | 7.80 b | 2.69 b | 93.81 b |
Table 3
Effects of lime and biochar application on the growth of peanut
处理 Treatment | 株高 Plant height /cm | 侧枝长 Lateral branch length /cm | 分枝数 No of total branches per plant | 营养体生物量 Nutritive organ biomass /(kg/hm2) |
---|---|---|---|---|
CK | 24.5 b | 30.3 c | 8.0 a | 5716.2 c |
B | 24.3 b | 30.6 c | 8.3 a | 6033.6 bc |
L | 25.8 b | 31.3 bc | 8.7 a | 6392.9 b |
B1L1 | 29.6 a | 36.5 a | 9.3 a | 7302.2 a |
B2L2 | 26.2 ab | 32.8 ab | 8.7 a | 6864.8 ab |
Table 4
Effects of biochar and lime application on yield and its component of peanut
处理 Treatment | 单株饱果数 Number of full pods per plant | 单株饱果重 Full pod weight per plant /g | 百果重 100-pod weight /g | 出仁率 Kernel percent /% | 产量 Yield /(kg/hm2) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CK | 13.3 c | 11.3 c | 177.7 c | 66.4 c | 4271.5 c |
B | 13.6 c | 12.5 c | 187.2 b | 66.6 bc | 4342.5 bc |
L | 16.0 bc | 13.4 bc | 190.7 b | 68.5 ab | 4957.5 b |
B1L1 | 21.0 a | 16.8 a | 211.7 a | 69.8 a | 5801.0 a |
B2L2 | 18.3 ab | 14.5 ab | 193.0 b | 68.6 ab | 5375.5 a |
1 |
张忠信, 王庆东, 赵婧伊, 等. 不同花生品种秸秆与籽仁营养成分综合分析[J]. 植物遗传资源学报, 2020, 21(1): 215-223. DOI:10.13430/j.cnki.jpgr.20191029004 .
doi: 10.13430/j.cnki.jpgr.20191029004 |
2 |
韩天富, 柳开楼, 黄晶, 等. 近30年中国主要农田土壤pH时空演变及其驱动因素[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2020, 26(12): 2137-2149. DOI:10.11674/zwyf.20399 .
doi: 10.11674/zwyf.20399 |
3 |
张玲玉, 赵学强, 沈仁芳. 土壤酸化及其生态效应[J]. 生态学杂志, 2019, 38(6): 1900-1908. DOI:10.13292/j.1000-4890.201906.002 .
doi: 10.13292/j.1000-4890.201906.002 |
4 |
张驭航, 李玲, 王秀丽, 等. 河南省土壤pH值时空变化特征分析[J]. 土壤通报, 2019, 50(5): 1091-1100. DOI:10.19336/j.cnki.trtb.2019.05.12 .
doi: 10.19336/j.cnki.trtb.2019.05.12 |
5 |
Meena H M, Prakasha H C. The impact of biochar, lime and fertilizer on soil acidity and microbiological properties and their relationship with yield of rice and cowpea in an acidic soil of Southern India[J]. J Plant Nutr, 2022, 45(3): 358-368. DOI:10.1080/01904167.2021.1952225 .
doi: 10.1080/01904167.2021.1952225 |
6 |
Yao L H, Yu X Y, Huang L, et al. Responses of Phaseolus calcaltus to lime and biochar application in an acid soil[J]. PeerJ, 2019, 7: e6346. DOI:10.7717/peerj.6346 .
doi: 10.7717/peerj.6346 |
7 |
张福锁. 我国农田土壤酸化现状及影响[J]. 民主与科学, 2016(6): 26-27. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1003-0026.2016.06.009 .
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-0026.2016.06.009 |
8 |
Mosharrof M, Uddin M K, Jusop S, et al. Integrated use of biochar and lime as a tool to improve maize yield and mitigate CO2 emission: a review[J]. Chil J Agric Res, 2021, 81(1): 109-118. DOI:10.4067/s0718-58392021000100109 .
doi: 10.4067/s0718-58392021000100109 |
9 |
Zhang K L, Chen L, Li Y, et al. The effects of combinations of biochar, lime, and organic fertilizer on nitrification and nitrifiers[J]. Biol Fertil Soils, 2017, 53(1): 77-87. DOI:10.1007/s00374-016-1154-0 .
doi: 10.1007/s00374-016-1154-0 |
10 | 孟赐福, 水建国, 吴益伟, 等. 红壤旱地施用石灰对土壤酸度、油菜产量和肥料利用率的长期影响[J]. 中国油料作物学报, 1999, 21(2): 45-48. |
11 |
于天一, 王春晓, 路亚, 等. 不同改良剂对酸化土壤花生钙素吸收利用及生长发育的影响[J]. 核农学报, 2018, 32(8): 1619-1626. DOI:10.11869/j.issn.100-8551.2018.08.1619 .
doi: 10.11869/j.issn.100-8551.2018.08.1619 |
12 |
张新帅, 张红宇, 黄凯, 等. 石灰与生物炭对矿山废水污染农田土壤的改良效应[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 2022, 41(3): 481-491. DOI: 10.11654/jaes.2021-0704 .
doi: 10.11654/jaes.2021-0704 |
13 |
Holland J E, Bennett A E, Newton A C, et al. Liming impacts on soils, crops and biodiversity in the UK: a review[J]. Sci Total Environ, 2018, 610/611: 316-332. DOI:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.08.020 .
doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.08.020 |
14 |
曾廷廷, 蔡泽江, 王小利, 等. 酸性土壤施用石灰提高作物产量的整合分析[J]. 中国农业科学, 2017, 50(13): 2519-2527. DOI:10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2017.13.011 .
doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2017.13.011 |
15 |
徐仁扣, 李九玉, 周世伟, 等. 我国农田土壤酸化调控的科学问题与技术措施[J]. 中国科学院院刊, 2018, 33(2): 160-167. DOI:10.16418/j.issn.1000-3045.2018.02.005 .
doi: 10.16418/j.issn.1000-3045.2018.02.005 |
16 |
闫志浩, 胡志华, 王士超, 等. 石灰用量对水稻油菜轮作区土壤酸度、土壤养分及作物生长的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2019, 52(23): 4285-4295. DOI:10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2019.23.009 .
doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2019.23.009 |
17 |
Berek A K, Hue N V. Characterization of biochars and their use as an amendment to acid soils[J]. Soil Sci, 2016, 181(9/10): 412-426. DOI:10.1097/ss.0000000000000177 .
doi: 10.1097/ss.0000000000000177 |
18 |
袁金华, 徐仁扣. 生物质炭对酸性土壤改良作用的研究进展[J]. 土壤, 2012, 44(4): 541-547. DOI:10.13758/j.cnki.tr.2012.04.010 .
doi: 10.13758/j.cnki.tr.2012.04.010 |
19 | 鲍士旦. 土壤农化分析[M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2000. |
20 |
朱盼, 应介官, 彭抒昂, 等. 生物炭和石灰对红壤理化性质及烟草苗期生长影响的差异[J]. 农业资源与环境学报, 2015, 32(6): 590-595. DOI:10.13254/j.jare.2015.0152 .
doi: 10.13254/j.jare.2015.0152 |
21 |
Blanco-Canqui H. Biochar and soil physical properties[J]. Soil Sci Soc Am J, 2017, 81(4): 687-711. DOI:10.2136/sssaj2017.01.0017 .
doi: 10.2136/sssaj2017.01.0017 |
22 |
夏浩, 张梦阳, 刘波, 等. 生物炭对作物氮肥利用率影响的整合分析[J]. 华中农业大学学报, 2021, 40(3): 177-186. DOI:10.13300/j.cnki.hnlkxb.2021.03.020 .
doi: 10.13300/j.cnki.hnlkxb.2021.03.020 |
23 |
徐晓楠, 陈坤, 冯小杰, 等. 生物炭提高花生干物质与养分利用的优势研究[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2018, 24(2): 444-453. DOI: 10.11674/zwyf.17223 .
doi: 10.11674/zwyf.17223 |
24 |
徐刚, 张友, 武玉, 等. 生物炭对土壤中氮磷有效性影响的研究进展[J]. 中国科学: 生命科学, 2016, 46(9): 1085-1090. DOI:10.1360/N052016-00062 .
doi: 10.1360/N052016-00062 |
25 |
Nguyen T T N, Xu C Y, Tahmasbian I, et al. Effects of biochar on soil available inorganic nitrogen: a review and meta-analysis[J]. Geoderma, 2017, 288: 79-96. DOI:10.1016/j.geoderma.2016.11.004 .
doi: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2016.11.004 |
26 |
Streubel J D, Collins H P, Garcia-Perez M, et al. Influence of contrasting biochar types on five soils at increasing rates of application[J]. Soil Sci Soc Am J, 2011, 75(4): 1402-1413. DOI:10.2136/sssaj2010.0325 .
doi: 10.2136/sssaj2010.0325 |
27 |
Limwikran T, Kheoruenromne I, Suddhiprakarn A, et al. Dissolution of K, Ca, and P from biochar grains in tropical soils[J]. Geoderma, 2018, 312: 139-150. DOI:10.1016/j.geoderma.2017.10.022 .
doi: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2017.10.022 |
28 |
Shaaban M, Peng Q, Hu R G, et al. Dolomite application to acidic soils: a promising option for mitigating N2O emissions[J]. Environ Sci Pollut Res, 2015, 22(24): 19961-19970. DOI:10.1007/s11356-015-5238-4 .
doi: 10.1007/s11356-015-5238-4 |
29 |
Teutscherova N, Vazquez E, Masaguer A, et al. Comparison of lime- and biochar-mediated pH changes in nitrification and ammonia oxidizers in degraded acid soil[J].Biol Fertil Soils, 2017, 53(7): 811-821. DOI:10.1007/s00374-017-1222-0 .
doi: 10.1007/s00374-017-1222-0 |
30 |
Fageria N K, Zimmermann F J P, Baligar V C. Lime and phosphorus interactions on growth and nutrient uptake by upland rice, wheat, common bean, and corn in an Oxisol[J]. J Plant Nutr, 1995, 18(11): 2519-2532. DOI:10.1080/01904169509365081 .
doi: 10.1080/01904169509365081 |
31 |
Wu S W, Zhang Y, Tan Q L, et al. Biochar is superior to lime in improving acidic soil properties and fruit quality of Satsuma mandarin [J]. Sci Total Environ, 2020, 714: 136722. DOI:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.136722 .
doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.136722 |
32 |
Hale S E, Nurida N L, Jubaedah, et al. The effect of biochar, lime and ash on maize yield in a long-term field trial in a Ultisol in the humid tropics[J]. Sci Total Environ, 2020, 719: 137455. DOI:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137455 .
doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137455 |
33 |
Jeffery S, Abalos D, Prodana M, et al. Biochar boosts tropical but not temperate crop yields[J]. Environ Res Lett, 2017, 12(5): 053001. DOI:10.1088/1748-9326/aa67bd .
doi: 10.1088/1748-9326/aa67bd |
34 |
Pandit N R, Mulder J, Hale S E, et al. Biochar improves maize growth by alleviation of nutrient stress in a moderately acidic low-input Nepalese soil[J]. Sci Total Environ, 2018, 625: 1380-1389. DOI:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.01.022 .
doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.01.022 |
[1] | Li-yun WAN, Wei-fang REN, Si-jian WANG, Peng HUANG, Peng XU, Jia-hai FANG. Identification and expression analysis of STS/CHS genes in peanut [J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF OIL CROP SCIENCES, 2023, 45(1): 102-110. |
[2] | Hai-ning WU, Zhi-peng HUANG, Xiu-mei TANG, Fa-qian XIONG, Jing JIANG, Rui-chun ZHONG, Zhu-qiang HAN, Jing LIU, Liang-qiong HE, Rong-hua TANG. Effects of N, P and K ratio on nutrient absorption, yield and economic benefit of peanut under sugarcane / peanut intercropping [J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF OIL CROP SCIENCES, 2023, 45(1): 155-163. |
[3] | Xin-long SHI, Yue-qin YANG, Suo-yi HAN, Xian XUE, Jun-jia GUO, Ya-qi WANG, Xin-you ZHANG. Effects of chitooligosaccharide soaking on germination and physiological metabolism of peanut seeds [J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF OIL CROP SCIENCES, 2023, 45(1): 164-174. |
[4] | Peng-xia GUO, Yu YOU, Bo-lun YU, Jian-bin GUO, Huai-yong LUO, Li HUANG, Nian LIU, Wei-gang CHEN, Yong LEI, Bo-shou LIAO, Li-ying YAN, Hui-fang JIANG, Xiao-jing ZHOU. Development of novel peanut germplasm with resistance to late leaf spot and elite yield and plant-type characteristics [J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF OIL CROP SCIENCES, 2023, 45(1): 95-101. |
[5] | Jia-li GONG, Dong-lei SUN, Neng-fei BIAN, Xing WANG, Xiao-jun WANG. Research progress of peanut bacterial wilt in China [J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF OIL CROP SCIENCES, 2022, 44(6): 1159-1165. |
[6] | Min-jie GUO, Li DENG, Yu-rong Li, Jin WANG, Li REN. Comprehensive evaluation of Jihua peanut varieties with high oleic acid based on principal component and cluster analysis [J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF OIL CROP SCIENCES, 2022, 44(6): 1210-1217. |
[7] | Qi-qi DONG, Yang YUAN, Qi DU, Zhen-hua LIU, Xiao-long SHI, Ke-zhao ZHANG, Dong-ying ZHOU, Xu YANG, Xiao-guang WANG, Chun-ji JIANG, Xi-bo LIU, Feng GUO, Xin-hua ZHAO, Hai-qiu YU. Effects of strip intercropping of maize and peanut on nitrogen uptake and soil microbial community diversity [J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF OIL CROP SCIENCES, 2022, 44(6): 1296-1306. |
[8] | Rui-qing WANG, Zhi-hua ZHANG, Feng-juan LYU, Hong-xin LIN, Lin-gen WEI, Yun-ping XIAO. Impact analysis of nitrogen fertilizer reduction on bacterial community structure and function in rhizosphere soil of continuous cropping sesame [J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF OIL CROP SCIENCES, 2022, 44(6): 1307-1319. |
[9] | Zhong-sheng CAO, Yan-da LI, Jun-bao HUANG, Bin-feng SUN, Chun YE, Shi-fu SHU, Luo-fa WU, Yong-chao TIAN. Sensitive vegetation indices and optimal bandwidths for monitoring peanut LAI and AGB [J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF OIL CROP SCIENCES, 2022, 44(6): 1320-1328. |
[10] | SACHURULA, BADUMUCAICIKE, Rui-lin TIAN, Zhan-ming HOU, Zhen-xing WANG. Effects of peanut, soybean and carrot as feed on development and adult survival of Dolycoris baccarum [J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF OIL CROP SCIENCES, 2022, 44(6): 1337-1340. |
[11] | Shao-jian LI, Meng GAO, Na WANG, Wan-wan FAN, Su-ling SANG, Guang YANG, Hang-yu LI, Xiao-wei CUI, Zhen-yu WANG. Differences in conidia of peanut web blotch pathogen and its pathogenicity analysis [J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF OIL CROP SCIENCES, 2022, 44(6): 1341-1348. |
[12] | Jia-ning LIANG, Jun ZHANG, Le-zeng TAN, Song-nan YANG, Xue-ying LI, Dan YAO, Liang-yu CHEN, Qiu-lin WU, Yong-yi XING, Xiao HAN. Transcriptome analysis of peanut protein mutants at different seed development stages [J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF OIL CROP SCIENCES, 2022, 44(5): 1018-1029. |
[13] | Ting XU, Yan-tao LIU, Hai-jiang WANG, Qiang LI, Peng WANG, Hong-ye DONG. Effects of saline-alkali stress on germination characteristics of peanut seeds and comprehensive identification and evaluation of salt damage [J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF OIL CROP SCIENCES, 2022, 44(5): 1037-1047. |
[14] | Xiao-jun WANG, Chun-li WANG, Zhi ZHANG, Jian-li YANG, Ya-jun GAO. Optimal application rate of nitrogen fertilizer in winter rape planting area in southern Shaanxi Province [J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF OIL CROP SCIENCES, 2022, 44(5): 1065-1073. |
[15] | Liang-qiang CHENG, Jian-bin GUO, Wei-tao LI, Li HUANG, Huai-yong LUO, Nian LIU, Xiao-jing ZHOU, Wei-gang CHEN, Jun WANG, Jian-wei LYU, Ting-hui HU, Qing-lin RAO, Yong LEI, Bo-shou LIAO, Hui-fang JIANG. Novel genotypes and quantitative trait locus for rust resistance in peanut [J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF OIL CROP SCIENCES, 2022, 44(5): 1074-1080. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||