
Effects of plant growth regulators on yield and related traits of continuous cropping soybean
Ji-dong YU, Chang-jun ZHOU, Zhong-kui GAO, Lan MA, Jian-ying LI, Yao-kun WU, Bing LIU, Na LI, Xiu-ying GONG
CHINESE JOURNAL OF OIL CROP SCIENCES ›› 2025, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (2) : 471-477.
Effects of plant growth regulators on yield and related traits of continuous cropping soybean
To improve quality and efficiency of continuous soybean cultivation through chemical control, effects of plant growth regulators on yield and traits of continuous cropping soybeans were studied. Nongqingdou 28 was used as material from 2022 to 2023. On the continuously 5-year-soybean planted experimental site, a randomized block design was conducted for plant growth regulators test. Six plant growth regulators were used, namely mepiquate chloride, uniconazole, chlormequat chloride, Yuhuangjin, Tontianbao, and Chitosan. They were sprayed during branching stage. Effects of different regulators were investigated on physiological characteristics, agronomic traits, yield, and quality of continuous cropping soybeans. Results showed that 4 growth regulators, including Tontianbao, Yuhuangjin, Uniconazole, and Chitosan, significantly increased yield, with an increase rate of 5.55% -10.3% in 2022, and 1.95% -11.59% in 2023 respectively. The increasing effects ranked in an order from high to low as Chitosan> Uniconazole> Yuhuangjin> Tontianbao. Additionally, the application of Tonianbao, Yuhuangjin, Uniconazole and Chitosan increased content of chlorophyll, soluble sugar, and soluble protein in soybeans, although reduced plant height. They also increased pods number per plant, grains number per plant, and hundred- grain weight.
plant growth regulator / continuous cropping soybean / agronomic characteristics / physiological characteristics / yield {{custom_keyword}} /
Table 1 Test reagents表1 供试药剂 |
处理 Treatment | 喷施剂量 Spraying dosage /(667 m2) | 生产厂家 Manufacturer |
---|---|---|
缩节胺(98%)可溶性粉剂 Mepiquate chloride(98%)soluble powders | 15 g | 四川国光农化股份有限公司 Sichuan Guoguang Agrochemical Co., Ltd. |
烯效唑(5%)可湿性粉剂 Uniconazole(5%)wettable powder | 80 g | 江苏剑牌农化股份有限公司 Jiangsu Jianpai Agrochemical Co., Ltd. |
矮壮素(50%)水剂 Chlormequat chloride(50%)aqueous solution | 75 g | 四川国光农化股份有限公司 Sichuan Guoguang Agrochemical Co., Ltd. |
玉黄金(30% 胺鲜脂·乙烯利) Yuhuangjin(30% Amine fresh ethephon) | 40 mL | 山西浩之大生物科技有限公司 Shanxi Haozhida Biotechnology Co., Ltd. |
吨田宝(22%)水剂 Tontianbao(22%)aqueous solution | 20 mL | 黑龙江禾田丰泽有限公司 Heilongjiang Hetian Fengze Co., Ltd. |
壳聚糖(80%)粉剂 Chitosan(80%)powder | 50 g | 山东朴正生物科技有限公司 Shandong Puzheng Biotechnology Co., Ltd. |
对照 Control | 清水处理 Water |
Table 2 Soybean agronomic traits under different treatments表2 不同处理下的大豆农艺性状 |
年 Year | 处理 Treatment | 株高 Plant height /cm | 节数 Pitch number | 单株荚数 Pods per plant | 单株粒数 Grains per plant | 百粒重 100-grain weight /g |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2022 | 缩节胺 Mepiquate chloride | 55.93±4.00 b | 16.70±0.80 a | 56.33±3.89 a | 69.41±3.40 c | 19.94±0.35 a |
烯效唑 Uniconazole | 63.97±6.19 ab | 16.67±1.70 a | 58.50±1.47 a | 88.19±8.73 b | 19.54±0.32 ab | |
吨田宝 Tontianbao | 65.87±8.07 ab | 16.23±1.84 a | 40.27±5.53 ab | 80.61±3.93 bc | 19.38±0.74 ab | |
矮壮素 Chlormequat chloride | 51.43±4.67 c | 14.80±1.26 a | 55.20±3.98 a | 79.92±5.25 c | 19.44±0.10 b | |
玉黄金 Yuhuangjin | 63.27±1.79 b | 17.17±1.03 a | 60.33±5.04 a | 89.78±6.48 b | 19.41±0.38 ab | |
壳聚糖 Chitosan | 64.47±5.72 ab | 16.73±0.52 a | 40.97±3.33 ab | 104.77±3.11 a | 19.39± 0.54 ab | |
对照 Control | 75.80±3.22 a | 15.63±0.90 a | 33.90± 1.85 b | 78.37±8.22 c | 19.36± 0.25 ab | |
2023 | 缩节胺 Mepiquate chloride | 56.91±6.13 b | 17.1±0.29 ab | 51.37±2.79 a | 74.50±8.50 cd | 19.31±0.82 ab |
烯效唑 Uniconazole | 62.74±1.95 ab | 16.7±0.83 ab | 55.5± 6.06 a | 79.95±2.50 c | 19.29±1.03 ab | |
吨田宝 Tontianbao | 65.14±6.21 ab | 16.14±1.22 ab | 36.8±2.70 b | 72.35±4.21 d | 18.85±0.58 bc | |
矮壮素 Chlormequat chloride | 51.25±3.28 b | 15.85±0.19 ab | 50.07± 3.18 a | 75.97±1.50 cd | 20.05±0.88 ab | |
玉黄金 Yuhuangjin | 63.33±4.19 b | 17.57±0.66 a | 59.87±1.27 a | 81.61±4.55 b | 20.02±1.18 ab | |
壳聚糖 Chitosan | 73.49±4.90 a | 16.88±0.34 ab | 37.89±6.12 b | 96.19±5.47 a | 18.58±0.75 bc | |
对照 Control | 74.43±0.66 a | 15.96±1.25 ab | 34.82±6.32 b | 71.27± 6.45d | 18.22±0.70 bc |
Table 3 Soybean yield and quality under different treatments表3 不同处理下的大豆产量和品质 |
年 Year | 处理 Treatment | 蛋白含量 Protein conten /% | 脂肪含量 Fat content /% | 产量 Yield /(kg/hm2) |
---|---|---|---|---|
2022 | 缩节胺 Mepiquate chloride | 40.85±0.70ab | 21.66±0.15ab | 2307.45±53.85d |
烯效唑 Uniconazole | 41.37±1.14a | 21.54±0.07b | 2686.55±67.57ab | |
吨田宝 Tontianbao | 39.72±0.62b | 21.7±0.33ab | 2620.05±87.28b | |
矮壮素 Chlormequat chloride | 40.57±0.03ab | 21.46±0.20b | 2266.05±73.51d | |
玉黄金 Yuhuangjin | 40.57±0.21ab | 21.26±0.31b | 2652.75±77.68b | |
壳聚糖 Chitosan | 40.88±0.37ab | 22.06±0.13a | 2738.00±91.28a | |
对照 Control | 41.31±0.25a | 20.69±0.22c | 2482.40±60.83c | |
2023 | 缩节胺 Mepiquate chloride | 40.71±0.39ab | 21.35±0.18a | 2548.75±47.93cd |
烯效唑 Uniconazole | 41.49±0.43a | 21.66±0.12a | 2796.45±73.69ab | |
吨田宝 Tontianbao | 41.10±0.87ab | 21.05±0.48a | 2629.10±79.19b | |
矮壮素 Chlormequat chloride | 41.23±0.43ab | 21.26±0.30a | 2375.50±68.31d | |
玉黄金 Yuhuangjin | 41.28±0.22a | 21.24±0.20a | 2641.20±75.09b | |
壳聚糖 Chitosan | 40.99±0.40b | 21.02±0.16a | 2877.75±96.83a | |
对照 Control | 40.78±0.73ab | 21.31±0.28a | 2578.75±57.44c |
1 |
郝俊锋. 我国大豆植物新品种权现状与法律保护研究[J]. 分子植物育种, 2024, 22(17): 5855-5860.
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
2 |
陈玲玲, 李战, 刘亭萱, 等. 基于783份大豆种质资源的叶柄夹角全基因组关联分析[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1333-1345. DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2022.14102 .
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
3 |
周长军. 大豆花荚期生物、根瘤鲜质量及农艺性状对产量的影响[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2020, 48(14): 99-103. DOI: 10.15889/j.issn.1002-1302.2020.14.016 .
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
4 |
项洪涛, 冯乃杰, 王立志, 等. 3种植物生长调节剂对马铃薯产量和营养品质的调控[J]. 中国马铃薯, 2015, 29(2): 97-102. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-3635.2015.02.008 .
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
5 |
项洪涛, 冯延江, 郑殿峰, 等. 植物生长调节剂对马铃薯产量和品质的调控研究进展[J]. 中国农学通报, 2018, 34(15): 15-19.
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
6 |
王诗雅, 郑殿峰, 项洪涛, 等. 初花期淹水胁迫对大豆叶片AsA-GSH循环的损伤及烯效唑的缓解效应[J]. 中国农业科学, 2021, 54(2): 271-285. DOI: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2021.02.004 .
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
7 |
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
8 |
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
9 |
李艳杰, 郭玉曦, 丁树东, 等. 1-MCP和壳聚糖处理对香菇采后抗氧化能力的影响[J]. 食品科技, 2018, 43(11): 38-44. DOI: 10.13684/j.cnki.spkj.2018.11.007 .
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
10 |
王磊明, 李洋, 张茜, 等. 壳聚糖-肉桂精油复合膜对蓝莓保鲜效果的影响[J]. 食品科技, 2017, 42(9): 14-21. DOI: 10.13684/j.cnki.spkj.2017.09.003 .
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
11 |
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
12 |
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
13 |
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
14 |
王畅, 赵海东, 冯乃杰, 等. S3307和DTA-6对芸豆生殖生长阶段光合特性和产量的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2018, 27(11): 162-170. DOI: 10.11686/cyxb2017508 .
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
15 |
黄文婷, 冯乃杰, 郑殿峰, 等. 烯效唑和胺鲜酯对大豆叶片光合特性与碳代谢的调控效应[J]. 大豆科学, 2020, 39(2): 243-251. DOI: 10.11861/j.issn.1000-9841.2020.02.0243 .
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
16 |
王娜, 杨思敏, 刘蓓蓓, 等. 植物生长调节剂对绿豆干物质积累动态与产量的影响[J]. 中国农业大学学报, 2021, 26(3): 10-17. DOI: 10.11841/j.issn.1007-4333.2021.03.02 .
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
17 |
韩毅强, 石英, 高亚梅, 等. 赤霉素及烯效唑对大豆形态、光合生理及产量的影响[J]. 中国油料作物学报, 2018, 40(6): 820-827. DOI: 10.7505/j.issn.1007-9084.2018.06.011 .
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
18 |
宫香伟, 刘春娟, 冯乃杰, 等. S3307和DTA-6对大豆不同冠层叶片光合特性及产量的影响[J]. 植物生理学报, 2017, 53(10): 1867-1876. DOI: 10.13592/j.cnki.ppj.2017.0075 .
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
19 |
李志华, 穆婷婷, 杨金慧, 等. 多效唑和矮壮素对糜子抗倒伏性及产量的影响[J]. 山西农业科学, 2023, 51(10): 1219-1225. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-2481.2023.10.14 .
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
20 |
耿小丽, 武慧娟, 付萍, 等. 叶面喷施多效唑、矮壮素、缩节胺对燕麦抗倒伏性和种子产量的调节作用[J]. 草业科学, 2023, 40(9): 2340-2347.
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
21 |
朱文雪, 杨立达, 漆信同, 等. 植物生长调节剂对大豆-玉米带状间作农艺性状及产量的影响[J]. 四川农业大学学报, 2023, 41(5): 773-780, 800. DOI: 10.16036/j.issn.1000-2650.202306249 .
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
22 |
温国泉, 刘永贤, 农梦玲, 等. 不同植物生长调节剂对南方淮山药叶片光合作用的影响[J]. 西南农业学报, 2016, 29(7): 1590-1594. DOI: 10.16213/j.cnki.scjas.2016.07.016 .
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
23 |
杨红梅, 张跃强, 史应武, 等. 不同类型叶面肥喷施对冬小麦籽粒产量和品质的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(9): 2182-2188. DOI: 10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2023.09.012 .
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
24 |
陆梅, 孙敏, 任爱霞, 等. 喷施叶面肥对旱地小麦生长的影响及与产量的关系[J]. 作物杂志, 2018(4): 121-125. DOI: 10.16035/j.issn.1001-7283.2018.04.020 .
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
25 |
周添. 大豆应用植物生长调节剂吨田宝试验研究[J]. 农业开发与装备, 2019(6): 117, 119.
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
26 |
罗晓峰, 代宇佳, 宋艳, 等. 三种植物生长调节剂对大豆生长发育及产量的影响[J]. 核农学报, 2021, 35(4): 980-988. DOI: 10.11869/j.issn.100-8551.2021.04.0980 .
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
27 |
张宪政. 植物叶绿素含量测定: 丙酮乙醇混合液法[J]. 辽宁农业科学, 1986(3): 26-28.
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
28 |
张志良, 瞿伟菁. 植物生理学实验指导[M]. 3版. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2003.
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
29 |
陈培, 郭玉海, 翟志席. SDS-PAGE电泳在肉苁蓉种间鉴定中的应用[J]. 种子, 2006, 25(11): 1-3. DOI: 10.16590/j.cnki.1001-4705.2006.11.036 .
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
30 |
田艺心, 高凤菊, 曹鹏鹏, 等. 大豆叶面积指数、干物质积累分配与产量的关系[J]. 山东农业大学学报: 自然科学版, 2018, 49(5): 750-754, 758. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2324.2018.05.004 .
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
31 |
郑伟, 谢甫绨, 郭泰, 等. 密度对不同类型大豆叶部性状的影响[J]. 中国油料作物学报, 2014, 36(1): 66-70. DOI: 10.7505/j.issn.1007-9084.2014.01.010 .
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
32 |
罗凯, 谢琛, 汪锦, 等. 外源喷施植物生长调节剂对套作大豆碳氮代谢和花荚脱落的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(4): 752-760. DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2021.04129 .
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
33 |
韩冬, 周伟鑫, 张景云, 等. 不同植物生长调节剂对大豆生长及产量的影响[J]. 黑龙江农业科学, 2023(12): 20-28. DOI: 10.11942/j.issn1002-2767.2023.12.0020 .
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
34 |
李跃伟, 侯金丹, 孙慕芳, 等. 四种生长调节剂对玉米茎秆性状及抗倒伏性的影响[J]. 江苏农业学报, 2023, 39(2): 377-382. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2023.02.010 .
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
35 |
张伟, 邱强, 赵婧, 等. 不同化控调节剂对杂交大豆产量及产量相关性状的调控效应[J]. 作物杂志, 2015(4): 81-84. DOI: 10.16035/j.issn.1001-7283.2015.04.018 .
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
36 |
王畅, 赵海东, 冯乃杰, 等. 两个生态区大豆光热资源利用率和产量的差异及对化控剂的响应[J]. 应用生态学报, 2018, 29(11): 3615-3624. DOI: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.201811.021 .
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
37 |
梁建秋, 于晓波, 张明荣, 等. 化控和密度对套作大豆南黑豆20农艺性状和产量的影响[J]. 大豆科学, 2018, 37(6): 876-882. DOI: 10.11861/j.issn.1000-9841.2018.06.0876 .
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
38 |
满振峰. 胺鲜酯与噻苯隆及其复配对大豆生长的调控和碳代谢机制[D]. 大庆: 黑龙江八一农垦大学, 2023.
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
{{custom_ref.label}} |
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
/
〈 |
|
〉 |