线虫胁迫下大豆钙调蛋白基因的表达分析

赵 晶,王媛媛,朱晓峰,刘晓宇,陈立杰,段玉玺

中国油料作物学报 ›› 2017, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (1) : 91.

PDF(2019 KB)
欢迎访问《中国油料作物学报》, 2025年6月1日 星期日
PDF(2019 KB)
中国油料作物学报 ›› 2017, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (1) : 91. DOI: 10.7505/j.issn.1007-9084.2017.01.014
土肥植保`

线虫胁迫下大豆钙调蛋白基因的表达分析

  • 赵 晶(1990-),女,博士研究生,从事植物线虫病害研究,E-mail:zj90929@163.com
作者信息 +

Analysis of calmodulins relative gene expression from different soybeans under SCN infection

Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

为明确受到大豆胞囊线虫侵染后大豆根部钙调蛋白基因的表达水平,本研究以感病品种辽豆15和抗病
品种灰皮支黑豆(ZDD2315)为试验材料,分别在接种线虫1d,3d,5d,9d,15d,20d取样,提取接种和未接种的大豆根
部总RNA,利用实时荧光定量PCR检测大豆钙调蛋白家族:SCaM1,SCaM2,SCaM3,SCaM4,SCaM5基因的表达量。
通过扩增SCaM4基因编码区序列,构建与报告基因GFP融合表达的细胞定位检测载体Pcombia1303-SCaM4,采
用农杆菌介导的方法将其瞬时表达在本氏烟(Nicotianabenthamiana)叶片上,激光共聚焦显微镜观察。结果表明无
论是抗性品种灰皮支还是感病品种辽豆15,在线虫侵染后5个钙调蛋白基因的表达量都在接种后第5d达最大值,
其中灰皮支黑豆SCaM4基因接种后基因表达量高达12.73,是未接种的1.85倍,为感病品种的1.96倍,初步认为
SCaM4可能参与了灰皮支黑豆抗线虫的过程。亚细胞定位的结果表明SCaM4蛋白定位在细胞膜上。

Abstract

A susceptible cultivar Liaodou 15 and a resistant cultivar Huipizhi heidou (ZDD2315) were selected to research the gene expression of calmodulins from soybeans roots after SCN3 infection. RNA from infected and uninfected roots was extracted at 1d, 3d, 5d, 9d, 15d and 20d and real-time PCR was carried out respectively. The complete SCaM4 gene was amplified into binary expression vector to construct Pcombia1303- SCaM4. LSCM was used to observe the location. The results demonstrated that in both cultivars the five calmodulins genes expression levels reached the maximum at the fifth day after infection among six time points. The gene expression of SCaM4 after infected was 1.85 fold of uninfected. And in resistant cultivar the relative expression of SCaM4 was 1.96 times of that in susceptible cultivar. The result of subcellular localization showed that SCaM4 protein was located on the cytomembrane. In summary SCaM4 may participate in the interaction of soybean and SCN3. 

关键词

大豆胞囊线虫 / 钙调蛋白 / 基因相对表达量

Key words

 Hereodera glycines / calmodulin / relative gene expression

引用本文

导出引用
赵 晶,王媛媛,朱晓峰,刘晓宇,陈立杰,段玉玺 . 线虫胁迫下大豆钙调蛋白基因的表达分析[J]. 中国油料作物学报, 2017, 39(1): 91 https://doi.org/10.7505/j.issn.1007-9084.2017.01.014
ZHAO Jing1, WANG Yuan-yuan1, ZHU Xiao-feng1, LIU Xiao-yu1, CHEN Li-jie1, DUAN Yu-xi* . Analysis of calmodulins relative gene expression from different soybeans under SCN infection[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF OIL CROP SCIENCES, 2017, 39(1): 91 https://doi.org/10.7505/j.issn.1007-9084.2017.01.014

参考文献

[1] 吴海燕,远 方,陈立杰,等.大豆胞囊线虫病与大豆抗胞囊线虫机制的研究[J].大豆科学,2001,20(4):285-289.

[2] 余晓丛,娜 仁,张少英.钙信号在植物抗病性中的作用研究进展[J].中国农学通报,2012,28(3):12-16.

[3] Du L Q, Gul S A, Kayla A S, et al. Ca2+/calmodulin regulates salicylic-acid-mediated plant immunity[J].Nature,2009,457(7233):1154-1158.

[4] Won D H,Sang H L,Min C K, et al.Involvement of specific calmodulin isoforms in salicylic acid-independent activation of plant disease resistance responses[J].Proc Natl Acad Sci USA,1999,96(2):766-771.

[5] 王 雪.大豆抗胞囊线虫机制及与抗性相关的差异蛋白质组学研究[D].沈阳:沈阳农业大学,2009.

[6] Benjamin F M, Hunter B, Margaret H M,et al. Engineered resistance and hypersusceptibility through functional metabolic studies of 100 genes in soybean to its major pathogen,the soybean cyst nematode[J].Planta,2013,237(5):1337-1357.

[7] 魏 利,李英慧,卢为国,等.接种大豆孢囊线虫4号生理小种诱导GmHs1pro-1基因的表达分析[J].农业生物技术学报,2011,19(1):77-84.

[8] Jian B, Liu B, Bi Y R, et al. Validation of internal control for gene expression study in soybean by quantitative real-time PCR[J].BMC Molecular Biology,2008,9(1):1-14.

[9] Heike S,Fabian T,Stefanie R,et al.Ca2+ signalling in plant immune response:from pattern recognition receptors to Ca2+ decoding mechanisms[J].New Phytologist,2014,204(4):782-790.

[10]Wolfgang K, Justin L, Sabine R, et al. Signal Perception and Transduction in Plants[M]. Plant relationships, Berlin: Heidelberg, 2009.337-361.

基金

国家自然科学基金重点项目(31330063)
PDF(2019 KB)

3026

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/